Vaccination is helpful for disease prevention as an alternative to tighter controls on environment and travel. Keeping the conversation on the level of the scientific fact and statistical likelihood of poor outcome after taking a shot is not, however the real solution to the question. The question of forced vaccinations is a question of trust - in the administering nurse / doctor, in the broader medical establishment, and in the regime / government in power. Where trust is already often lacking and methods of validation and customer advocacy and watchguard organizations are not given the transparency or depth of access needed for validation of supplies and protocol, systematization only amplifies the risk of misuse of the power of patronizing unreliable authority that performs backroom deals that eventually put segments of the population at risk.
Consider what it would mean to put your daughter under Larry Nassar's care and hope for the best, even because of all the signs of his expertise and professional authority. Then consider someone of a different racial background than yourself that hates your people, or of a different generation that hates the young / old, or just someone who loves money more than you whoever or whatever you are, having unquestionable access and unlimited authority over what they put into your body without the option for a system of trust and verification that gives you say in what is going over your head. It's not much different in terms of dread than the Holocaust, even if the demographic isn't Jewish. If Darwin is the father of your social science, your applied sciences will gravitate towards endless cruelty.