Comment Easy fix - ditch chrome (Score 1) 158
This should be a notification to ditch this slop. Fortunately I never used chrome to begin with.
This should be a notification to ditch this slop. Fortunately I never used chrome to begin with.
What happens if the cap is exceeded? Forced abortions, sterilization, and euthanizing the surplus?
Perhaps kids who feel emotionally defeated by extra practice arenâ(TM)t being challenged and need more advanced content?
The USA isnâ(TM)t really handing them cash. Itâ(TM)s handing money to defense contractors, which are shipping them weapons.
The Supreme Court will strike down that pesky right of action as violating qualified immunity
you speak as though the government is here to serve you. It isn't - it is here to serve itself. You are merely tax cattle to pay for it. go back to your circuses on your phone, peasant.
It costs time to develop software. It costs time to support software. It costs time to fix bugs. It costs money to lease server space and provide bandwidth. Why not charge for support, documentation, and feature requests? Keep binaries and source are available.
Eventually they will embed cameras in the screens to monitor your eyes. The ads will pause until youâ(TM)re looking at them.
How do you quantify those savings?
When does a tech company not infest everything with ads? Thatâ(TM)s the point of tech - seek rent everywhere
Most lack the mental fortitude to stop paying/using over this
The founding fathers were concerned about a terrifying all powerful government trampling the rights of its citizens. Why would that translate to the government disarming and diminishing the possible strength of the militia?
The militia is defined as all men between the ages of 18-45. Members of the militia weee required to provide their own weapons and equipment.
Why does t that mean that all citizens between 18-45 are required to own military grade weapons, under the original meaning of the second amendment?
Why is the tax code so complicated that we need software like this in the first place, and why arenâ(TM)t we pushing to make it simpler?
Why is that a bad thing? A library of validated functions that can be glued together would be more secure and more stable than bespoke programming. Itâ(TM)s not as efficient, but with modern processors why is that important? In the industrial automation world this is what systems like PlantPAX are for.
Why donâ(TM)t the people who run those companies have the right to decide how to invest their resources?
It costs money to patch obsolete stuff
"Summit meetings tend to be like panda matings. The expectations are always high, and the results usually disappointing." -- Robert Orben