The same was said about MuseScore. And here we are, four years after v4.0 was tagged, still unable to save midi files with the current volume settings like v3.x did.

Did you know that the company that acquired MuseScore in 2017 is the same company that acquired Audacity in 2021?

Xylitos has a sweetness comparable to normal sugar. It is misleading to say its concentration is 1000 times higher when the point of reference is "very low amounts". They probably add as much xylitol as they would add normal sugar otherwise.

Microsoft didn't kill off the direct parallel interface. Windows 11 has the exact same parallel port support as Windows 2000. It has a kernel-level API that can be used to query the features and I/O addresses of parallel ports. But the only driver provided by Microsoft that makes use of this API is the ParallelVdm driver, which gives applications only access to the basic parallel port functionality. No bidirectional modes, no EPP, no ECP.

The purpose of that driver is to bypass Windows' memory protection to access arbitrary I/O ports from user space and to map physical memory regions into the address space of a process. It is a cheap workaround for people who don't want to go through the certification process required by Microsoft for drivers nowadays.

We are a neighbor of France and it has been illegal here for at least 18 years. I still get called about twice a year by people trying to sell me solar panels, wine, stocks or elder care services,

As German-speaking people can read on https://netzpolitik.org/2025/g... it was the public prosecutor's office who asked for the home to be raided, not the vice chancelor. And they knew that the raided person also posted antisemitic stuff, which is also illegal. They just didn't mention this as the official request for the raid.

People from the US have been made fun of for being unable to drive a stick shift for decades. You can start mourning its death, when it vanishes from European streets.

Then why did the US give up paying in cash?

As someone whose job includes commenting on every f***ing CVE that is reported for the software on a customer's device, I look forward to this reducing the number of CVEs. There are lots and lots of CVEs that do not compromise the security of a system and at most are locally exploitable DoSes.

Please point me to the paragraphs that gives the works council this right.

The case you mentioned might be due to paragraph 112 BetrVG. That paragraph says that the employer and the works council have to agree on a plan (Sozialplan) for what happens with the employees affected by significant restructuring. The works council will try to prevent unfairness towards those that leave the company. Those that stay are not in focus as long as the company can continue to function without those that leave.

Works councils in Germany have no say in voluntary termination agreements (AufhebungsvertrÃge). The works council has to be given a chance to comment on involuntary terminations (which makes a difference if the terminated person sues) and it negotiates company-wide agreements (Betriebsvereinbarungen).

You can't be serious. This is one of many projects funded by Germany's Sovereign Tech Agency. They are also funding or have funded Python, PHP, Scala, R, SDCC, JUnit, GFortran, OpenJS, Haskell Cabal, and Ruby Gems. And it wasn't their idea to fund Rust Coreutils. Project have to apply to get money.

It's seemingly being used - actively - by governments (particularly, Germany) to reimplement important parts of the open source ecosystem.

Source?

The measure ran out because those lawmakers, who wanted scanning, wanted to make it mandatory and were not willing to accept a proposed compromise.

What the article forgets to mention is that almost every tech expert was against it. There were also several big petitions that tried to change the lawmaker's minds.

Scanning of online communication invades the user's privacy and implementing mandatory scanning as proposed would have enabled the government to abuse it. What these big tech companies now mourn is that they no longer have an excuse to violate their user's privacy to make money - at least not when sending messages.

What about services that access the internet on behalf of other applications? If you use systemd-resolved, like many modern distributions, all applications will connect to the local service to perform DNS lookups. On older systems you might find nscd doing the same, although the reason and method are different.

To which process does Little Snitch map these requests?