We just had a story a short while ago about Wikipedia having plateaued. With the current system, barely any revisions by members outside the WP "elite" actually make it through. Now with forced moderation, that will likely drop to zero. There's a distinct line between janitor and censor that I believe is being crossed here. I can understand the community trying to rid WP of garbage. That follows with the protection of some commonly vandalized articles. I just think that protection of articles was supposed to be the exception; this change makes it the rule. Wikipedia, the encyclopedia that anyone can try to edit.

Before we get into proving how someone is female, can we first all agree on what female means? Even with a Y chromosome, I seem to recall that nonfunctional hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase can result in a fully reproductively capable female who looks the part. What sort of female do you need to be to qualify for women's athletics? XX? Functioning ovaries? Sure, we can probably come to a consensus over a test with some deliberation. But what exactly should the criteria be?

Cats doused in pitch, set aflame, and dropped in frantic rage upon my enemies. Sorry PETA, this is war.

I'd be wary about the use of "defined" here. Pi is defined as the ratio between the circumference of a circle and its diameter.