In a word, you are wrong. And oh please! A NDA, geez? No his emails include discussions on how to intimidate folks from questioning global warming, and how to avoid producing the data and avoid complying with the law.

Here's a link to the story in the Daily Mail. Nothing the headline and major bullets at the top. In fact, the story goes on in saying that Dr.Jones "can't find his data", it doesnt claim that his data is covered by a non-disclosure. WHAT A FANTASY! Of course this guy works at what us Yanks call a publically funded university.

The story continues on to confirm there has been no global warming since 1995 (see that's really what "no" and "no significant" means) in the dictionary. and as to the prior warming period have been similar warm periods earlier in the 20th century, and confirms that there was a MidEvil warm period, etc.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1250872/Climategate-U-turn-Astonishment-scientist-centre-global-warming-email-row-admits-data-organised.html

Now as to Mars, here's just one of the stories -- this time from National Geographic -- confirming the warming trend on Mars that occurred in parallel to Earth's. This using Earth and Mars data generated from satellite measurements.

http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2007/02/070228-mars-warming.html

I would go on but the rest of your post is purely argumentative on face value. Simple enough for you?

I guess all those climate change die hards missed Dr. Jones admission that there's not been any evidence of global warming since 1995. that he admitted writing email in discussion trying to avoid producing his data to Freedom of Information requests. And then once before that POLITICAL panel, he winds up not producing any of his hockey stick data at all. He just plain lost it. Poor guy.

You all must have missed the story that the IPCC "scientists" approve one report language as to conclusions if any, and the politicians rewrite the report conclusions. Hmm. Na, that wouldn't happen, would it?

Yup, you can be all proud and feel safe at night knowing that nothing was found wrong by a POLITICAL panel, since Dr. Jones turned over no data. Can't prove data was manipulated if there's no data to examine. Yup, the entire history of the scientific method thrown right out the window.

So much for scientific scepticism that poor Dr. Jones just couldn't find his original hockey stick data that made him famous. You know the one that fails to show any Midevil warming period, no mini-ice age. The one that stops right at 1961, and doesn't show -- what the tree ring data -- you know that data that shows the warming and cooling periods since 1961. Or that the IPCC hand picked one pattern of data and weighed 390x over the others. (yeah, just some minor problems with the statistics, right. A huh!)

ALL to exaggerate the import of .5 degrees Celsius' rise at a low point in Earth's temperature and CO2 history. All to claim there's a CO2 connection when there is no connection. It's just that pesky solar radiation, you know the activity that was at a historic high. (Did I read it was an 8000 year high. No it couldn't be, that would be .... gasp.... contradicting to the global warming religion.)

Those Martians, Jovians, Titans, and Plutonians -- with their SUV's and all -- warming each of those planets during the same period of high solar activity. And dont you think that its strange that none of these places have "green house" gases, well unless you count Titan's liquid methane oceans.

Gosh I get goose bumps all over, as I am so terrified about the earth ... now that it's begun cooling again -- what -- these past 10 years.

What ever you all are smokin, just keep smokin it. The same BS was going on by some of the same people in the 70s, then predicting this hell all freezing over.

you are entitled to your opinions, but not to your own facts. The assertion that the "right have a strangle hold on the media" boarders on delusional. For at least 25 years, I've repeatedly read surveys showing that well over 75% of all news media employees are liberal Democrats. The fact that you wish to attack me personally for anything I might have said here is the clearest indication that you are an ultra-lefty. you folks have never met a conservative that you wont attempt to disenfranchise from [our] free speech rights at the drop of the nearest ad hominem you can spit out. I'm sure it will further infuriate you to include the following paraphrase from Ronald Reagan: "how can you claim to love America, but hate your fellow Americans."