Comment Re:Time to Short Apple's Stock (Score 1) 457
No. In that case, the original author is harmed by being deprived of revenue
But according to you, not if the person infringing wouldn't have paid for it anyway. This is Kesuki's position as you put it, right?
and the public is harmed by being suckered into paying money for something they could have gotten for free
So wait---if I pay for something (a game, for example) that Kesuki gets for free then I am harmed? Does this not contradict what you were saying earlier about nobody being harmed by his violating copyright?
You are becoming very tangled within the
To answer your broader point [...]
Have I made one? Don't assume you know what it is.
