The competition is to blame. If they didn't have the policy of COPYING Amazon's price increases in the first place, they could undercut Amazon's increases.

Everything you wrote is made up. Cite sources for "public trust regulation" that applies to this situation or GTFO.

Maybe the AI bot intervened to save this guy's life

Count on Forbes (and Fortune) to be completely bought and paid-for by whatever malicious status-quo interest has the highest offer, and then to offer you their worthless content behind a paywell.

I'm always sure to ban these publications from very feed / alert / litter box I'm using.

The original idea of Bakkt was great. Physically-settled bitcoin futures could underpin an elegant, *manipulation-resistant* glue layer that allowed the traditional financial system to facilitate instant transactions denominated in BTC at massive scale.

But we couldn't have that no, could we?

So they pivoted to be yet another irrelevant everything-wallet.

So your rent gets you a home AND something more (equity). So, all else equal, the rent will be *higher*.

With a normal rental at market rates, you can invest the extra money in *whatever you want*. So a normal rental is strictly better.

Come join the party

Technically, this means BTC futures can only be manipulated with CFTC permission.

Not that they would ever allow such a thing.

Unless the FBI cares to prove it, nobody knows who controls the receiving address. It could easily be someone who paid for the coins.

For example, an exchange who then sold an offsetting amount from other controlled addresses.

Just like last time, the market moves over the last few days strongly suggest that the FBI is already selling, or has already sold these bitcoins into the market.