Comment Re: Ultimate plagiarism (Score 1) 87
There you go. One of many examples:
https://docs.aws.amazon.com/am...
Turns off attribution but doesn't stop the model from using the code.
There you go. One of many examples:
https://docs.aws.amazon.com/am...
Turns off attribution but doesn't stop the model from using the code.
The training process is not everything. One example is that models, after being trained, have external interfaces to fetch outside data for use with the model, augmenting the model's own data store. That's why, for example, they can answer questions about events and data being created at the moment. So even if you target the training process and make sure that you train on open data only, which is near impossible in practice, you are still wide open to infringing while using the model.
And no - it's you who are wrong. Some agents have clear switches to hide attributions.
I think you're right.
Of course they don't. They actually usually don't have a say in the matter at all. Ideas like these come from the world-detached executive level. All the middle management hear is "I don't care. Just get it done."
Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't AI is just one, big, ultimate plagiarism engine?
The creators of AI models are so aware of this that some of them actually added config switches to hide code attributions in generated content...but without stopping models from using copyrighted code in the first place. Just hide attributions and play stupid.
AI companies and their marketing department somehow managed to convince the world that the number of used tokens represents productivity.
What I would argue it actually represents unproductivity. After all, if you've got to use thousands of tokens to do the simplest jobs right, it means that productivity per token (and unit of cost) is low.
So yes - well done marketing departments. You've managed to turn the reality around and convince your customers to consume as much as possible and pay ridiculous amounts of money to cover the shortcomings of your crap product.
Lane assist is a disaster waiting to happen.
Thanks. I do understand statistics pretty well. I just find sports boring, and because of that I don't really care much about the inner probabilities of the game; the game doesn't stimulate me enough to care, so I take it at face value.
I'm sorry for your loss.
With this ever-growing number of satellites we won't need Arc Net to protect us. Boglodite invasion ships will just all crash on our space junk.
Take football for example. 22 players, 3 referees and 1 ball interacting for 90min+ in a totally unpredictable pattern, in a swirling vortex of entropy, and the result is always one of 3 options: team A wins, team B wins, or it's a draw. It's simply not worth 90+ minutes of my life if I can guess the result with 33.3% success rate.
I've always wondered who the f... actually watches that total trash.
Just a modern 50 inch qned TV with a sound bar. Nothing fancy setup-wise, but nothing beats peace and quiet, and a sofa that perfectly remembers your buttprint.
I'm one of those people who can't stand subtitles. They distract me too much.
Where I live, there's a lot of entitled, disruptive people. People talking loudly during the film, on their phones, sometimes even taking calls, people kicking your seat, or hanging massive coats on their seats, right in front of you...
I think I'm mentally done with the communist approach to film watching.
A sheet of paper is an ink-lined plane. -- Willard Espy, "An Almanac of Words at Play"