Stop mixing things together to suit your own narrative.

There is no overarching crisis of trust spanning those domains. There's just you trying to bundle unrelated subjects together to make you look better and to justify and deflect from your own shortcomings.

Yes, in general we don't trust tech and governments, but the reasons behind those feelings are completely different to why we don't trust or want to adopt AI.

We don't trust governments because they oppress us under the guise of protection, of our own good.

We don't trust tech because they try to monetise us at every opportunity, and change and make us adapt at an unsustainable pace.

We don't trust AI because it's the ultimate plagiarism, it lies to us all the time, it's unreliable, an illusion of knowledge, stops us from learning, shatters lives, elevates bills, destroys landscapes and all that so that CEOs like you can drive a new Ferrari or buy a new yacht.

Apples and oranges. Day and night.

Sadly, the internet is full of them.

Because making less money is CEOs utmost priority.

They will take the discs away and rake in more profit by reducing delivery costs, limiting reselling and keeping prices equal or higher.

Simples explanations are usually the best.

CEOs are the ultimate salespeople, selling you their deam. All those manifestos are nothing more than an ultimate sales pitch.

Billions are being spent on something that is not bringing any significant returns so they must be in a panic mode. Why else bother a CEO for their opinion?

And who's going to foot the bill? You're asking us to pay our employees the same for less and then pay for your tokens on top of it.

It's like you're asking companies to shoot themselves in the foot, reduce resource-hours, create a backlog of work just so that you can come and fix it. How about you stop asking for scraps and actually try do some quality work, something actually useful?

It sounds like they are pitching the idea of a 4-day week so that people working less creates the work for AI, instead of trying to solve the problems that already exist.

Easy way around it. Scrape text, then turn the doc into an image and do OCR on it. If the text and text as image different by a significant amount, use the OCR version.

I've made a similar comment below. Political correctness has gone absolutely mad. Totally bonkers. How do we stop it??

That person has a name and chances are the person is a "he" with the name of Matthew Elliott. Stop writing everything in gender-neutral way by default.

I'd rather spend an entire day writing code, learning something, keeping my brain engaged, in the state of flow, and actually enjoying it than trying to correct a mediocre agent all day, getting frustrated and burnt out, and still having to pay for it.

What is a million output tokens comparable to? How many lines of average-length code, over how many attempts/corrections? Just to give us a better understanding of what one would be paying 3.75 for, and if it's worth it.

You need professional help, dude.

If big tech think they can turn this into a commercial, everyday product they are in for a big surprise. Because let's be honest - who would ever wear this kind of equipment outside a lab?

In a few years this whole idea will be seen as another useless scientific toy that wasted copious amounts of money for nothing, and that is written off on the tax statement.

This article is a duplicate.

At least they're competent enough to have noticed.