it would wait the publishing industry. Oh wait.

it does however state that they follow Cilip's ethics framework which is within the law (I don't think the law allows pr0n on school grounds but feel free to verify)

correlation! =causation

for gringos to pay their due :)

when they mean "forced-down-your-throat copilot tools"?

how did something called "poly-flu-urinated" get into my balls again?

that's not an argument, that's a petty technicality just FYI

what part of "from grandparents on speakerphone to toddlers on iPads" did you not understand?

> "We shouldn't be the ones doing this kind of study," said Ewing. "The vendors, those who are proposing and receiving federal support to develop advanced reactors, should be concerned about the waste and conducting research that can be reviewed in the open literature." That's the option that makes the least economic sense, because why would they spend money in producing research that goes against their bottom line? And if the result is in favor there's reason to mistrust them so additional independent research will be required anyway, just to make sure they aren't full of bs

Arguably 99.9% of the cringe caused by Lizzo comes from comments written by a bunch of fatphobic, borderline racists in this very publication lol

for zuckers

> The most important fact in the article - that was clearly trying to make a "men are monsters" argument - is that the number of women stalking men with Airtags was nonzero. How about those 50 men out of 51 stalkers are the ones making a "monsters are men" argument?

Slippery slope fallacy

Or moderation*

and I couldn't agree more because he's gotten rich on spreading harmful bullshit.