I usually paint it like this: What if ISPs and common carriers started deciding to block FoxNews.com because they didn't like the message?
Then I'd switch ISPs. If they all blocked it, I'd get together with individuals who reject that sort of censorship and we'd invest in a new ISP would not block that content. However those ISPs who would choose to block content would lose customers and need to answer to their stockholders. Democracy and Capitalism at their best. However, when I delegate control to the Federal Government however incrementally, I'll eventually get hundreds of thousands of pages of regulation. And only the largest carriers can afford to understand and comply with that. And you will probably end up with China-level censorship anyway. Why pay a bunch of bureaucrats to "interpret" the wavering and politicized intent of NN when I have so much more influence by keeping them out of it.
You will lose an important tape file.