Comment Re:Right (Score 1) 545
Actually yes, that's exactly what it means.
Warrants are in place to protect people from illegal search and seizure. If during the course of a legal search items not covered in the original warrant are found the officers are required to attain a secondary warrant for the new items.
In regards to your stop sign example, they do that too, and that's exactly the problem. Law enforcement agencies constantly step over the line, which is unacceptable. they often act no better than the criminals they're trying to catch, illegal wire taps, illegal broad scope searches, excessive force... On the west coast of Canada -where I live- the police have been accompanying "electrical inspection teams" whenever a house has a higher than normal power consumption. They are illegally searching for pot grow operations under the guise of a safety inspection, our own courts have deemed this unlawful. Take the examples of the RIAA and law firms in the UK sending out random letter to "possible" copyright infringers demanding payment for downloaded music. This is nothing more than extortion, there is rarely sufficient evidence of the crime. It amounts to the enforcment of criminal law by civilian persons through civil litigation, which... Is against the law. The list goes on.
We live in a society where our civil rights are supposed to be protected, this "well I have nothing to hide so search away" attitude just diminishes the freedoms and protection we are guaranteed by our charters.
Personally I never agree to willful searches or any other conduct I dont explicitly have to agree to. I'm not hiding anything, but the rules are in place for a reason.