Gross racism at M$ (Score -1, Offtopic)

It happened in ChatWorld...

Some months ago, I had an extraordinarily clear-cut encounter with Jewish racism (probably including some emanating from beguiled Gentiles) at The Microsoft Network. The links below will take you to my account of my experiences, in the order that I had them. However, you should be aware that people have been reporting further instances of Jewish racism. One of my correspondants says that he was forbidden to say the word "white" and the word "nationalism" in the same chat comment, which implies that the Jews are trying to prevent the idea that there could be such a thing as White Nationalism, though apparently comments about Zionism (Jewish nationalism) are okay, as long as they are supportive.

What I have been told from yet other sources indicates that the Anti-Defamation League of B'nai B'rith has invested a lot of money in portraying racism as a redneck thing that only hicks and hillbillies do. In other words, the ADL desperately wants to keep people from knowing that racism has a philosophical underpinning that might convince a good many people if they were to read and understand it. It is possible that the influence of the ADL, or some similar Jewish organization, led to the experiences that I've had, and that others have had, at MSN ChatWorld.

The preceding four parts of this story are given on the pages linked below.

Part 1 Part 2 Part 3 Part 4

I am continuing to receive reports from goings-on within ChatWorld chat rooms, and also other MSN chat rooms, and all of the news is bad. One fellow got banned (not specced or merely kicked) from a chat room called "Internet Cafe" after he described the room's atmosphere as "stale." Host power abuse simply cannot get any more egregious than that.

Whatever MSN had going for it in its earlier years is gone now, and MSN's decline is probably a lesson in what can happen when a once-excellent discussion and dialog server is shabbily run. My advice to everyone is that they save their money for an ISP and use web-based BBS and chats.

Here's part of a letter from someone who browsed this page in October 2000. Apparently, the Jews and liberal freaks in control over at MSN are still playing their dirty tricks.

Jerry,

I used to (and still do to an extent) frequent the new java chat rooms at chat.msn.com. Before this I chatted in the IRC chats, but they were closed down about a year ago. I noticed that several of the old IRC hosts were now hosts at this java chat too.

I met a group of people a few months ago on MSN, they had started a room called "Aryan Chat 14/88," and I got to know some of them quite well. Before this, I hadn't known any other people who felt the way I do about things, since I'd never seen any racialist chat rooms on IRC before. Things were good for about the first month I was frequenting these Aryan rooms. I didn't have an internet connection so I could only be on occasionally, but the times I did come on using a friend's computer were pleasant, we would have interesting discussions about various racialist subjects. Sometimes troublemakers would come into these rooms and harrass us, but we kicked them out and banned them, just as a Jewish host in a Jewish room might do to us, if for some reason we went in there.

One day, I noticed a person that came into our room, and cussed at us in all the usual ways, so we kicked and banned him as we would usually do. However, about 10 minutes later, a regular MSN host came into the room with this "beacon of intelligence" in trail, promptly tells us "racism is not allowed" and we shouldn't kick people for their views or their color. I had a chance to be shocked stunned and amused by this hypocritical statement, as the host proceeded to kick everybody out of the room and shut it down. Now I don't remember this guy ever mentioning his race to me, so how could I have kicked him because of racism? How could I have kicked him because of his views when the only words he said in the room were insults? This as I discovered was my encounter with the "new" MSN, and if I had realized it was going to get as bad as it is, I would have saved the transcript.

Several incidents in the style of the above matter happened over the next couple of months, with hosts coming and closing down any chat room that kicked these slimy little people who would go running to the hosts as soon as they were kicked out of the chat rooms for causing trouble, such as commenting about bestiality, homosexuality, incest, child molesting, rape, or any combination of these subjects directed as insults at us. Isn't it funny how some sick Jew or negroid can come into our room, insult us, talk about raping children, and we get our room shut down for not tolerating this abusive person, whose antics would have gotten him kicked from ANY chat room, no matter what their political or racial views were. And, as a "bonus," we were reprimanded for talking about "racist" subjects.

This was a nearly daily occurence at the MSN java chats, and we would merely create another room after our previous room was shut down. However, the best was yet to come, and it happened to me personally.

One evening I appeared to be the only one of us "evil racists" that were online so I decided to create a room. I named it to the effect of "White Pride Chat 14/88" and the subject of the room was something like "white people's chat" or "White pride chat" but it definitely did not say "No non-whites allowed." Well, I was in there all alone, until one of these people that would provoke us to kick him showed up, taunting me to kick him. I refused to, because I knew that my room would be shut down as soon as I did. I put this person on ignore instead.

When saw that he wasn't getting any attention he must have left. I didn't see him go, as I was talking in another chat room. A couple of my friends arrived and we were having a bit of a talk when "Host Ishie" appears in the room with this guy in tow, and she promptly kicks everyone in the room with no explanation. I thought this was weird, as Host Ishie used to be on the IRC chats hosting a pagan room, although I had nothing much to do with her.

Another thing I found interesting, was the fact that she came back with this guy, and kicked without saying a word, I didn't even find out what the trouble was until I decided to find out myself. I went to the "Help Desk" room where I found Host Ishie. I asked politely why my room was shut down without explanation. I got the response: "It violated the MSN code of conduct." So ok, I asked, how exactly did it violate the MSN code of conduct? Ishie said "Racist chats are not tolerated." I proceeded to read the code of conduct, and I saw this statement, among others:

                "Microsoft reserves the right to remove communities and chats that advocate or encourage expressions of violence, bigotry, racism, hatred, or profanity"

So then I asked "in what way was my room racist?" I was told it had a racist name and subject.

A racist name and subject????? How is White Pride racist when there are Afro-american chats, sometimes around 13 of them, created by MSN, and MSN permits "Black Pride," "Hispanic Pride," "Gay Pride," "Asian Pride," and even rooms that talk about homosexuality, sadist sex, child pornography, pedophilia: 'daddy's girls', and similarly sick subjects. (Use your imagination; if you can think of it there's probably a chat room for it.)

I asked them how is "White Pride" a racist name for a chat room? I got the answer, "It violates the MSN code of conduct."

I'm being led in circles here. At this stage Host Ishie says she has to go. I am polite so I say goodbye, and she leaves the chat. I asked one of the other hosts about how White Pride is so offensive to the code of conduct and I got the typical response, "I didnt kick you, you will have to speak to Host Ishie about it."

This is exactly the kind of behavior from MSN staff that I observed while I was a customer of MSN Chatworld.

MSN either employs or tolerates agents provocateur who are allowed to violate MSN's normal Terms of Service and Community Standards as they bombard a targeted "politically incorrect" group with provocations designed to elicit a TOS or community standards violation from that group. Whereas MSN staff will "wink" at any TOS or Community Standards violations by the agents provocateur, any committed by members of the targeted group will incur an administrative penalty.

A kicking or a kick-banning that would be judged reasonable, in view of an offender's behavior, in a chat room devoted to a PC theme will be judged as "unfair" when it is done by the creator of a chat room devoted to a "politically incorrect" theme.

An agent provocateur need not succeed in documenting an angry reaction to his abuses in a "politically incorrect" chat. He need only report feeling uncomfortable as the result of witnessing chat room dialog by persons who differ with his own political or racial views. This report is the only justification that an MSN staff member needs to enter a "politically incorrect" chat room, kick out its chatters, and shut it down. It does not matter that the complainer could have avoided discomfort by not entering the chat room, whose theme was clearly designated in its title and subject line.

When asked to explain his conduct, an MSN staff member will assert that a "politically incorrect" chat room violated the MSN Code of Conduct. When asked about the specific nature of the violation, the MSN staffer will assert that the chat room's title, subject or content was unacceptable: for example, the title "White Pride." When you argue that "White Pride" can't be deemed unacceptable unless "Black Pride" and "Gay Pride" (among others) are also deemed unacceptable, and then ask why your room was shut down, the staffer will say, "It violated the MSN code of conduct."

At this point, it will be obvious to alert people that the only bigots in the area are the MSN staff members and their pet agents provocateur who consider proud Whites to be racists, but not proud Asians, or proud Blacks, or proud Jews, or proud homosexuals, etc. The MSN staffer's justification is circular, based on itself, like a dictionary definition that uses the word being defined. And since that fact would become increasingly obvious as more trips around the circle were made, the MSN staff member will generally be unwilling to make them.

If you ask another MSN staffer to explain the behavior of the staffer who shut down your room, he'll feign ignorance most bureaucratically.

Note, added on 31 December 2000. I was just now in an MSN chat for headline news, and I observed that there is an automatic procedure that kicks you out of the chat room if you say certain words. Included among the common swear words, obscene terms, and slang words for sexual organs was the word ARYAN. I saw someone get kicked out for using the word "aryan" on a chat line. Now, Aryan is derived from an old Indo-European words meaning "noble," and is evident in the names Iran and Eire (Ireland). But during WW2, Adolf Hitler used the word to refer to White people. And this was not at all improper, since the Aryan peoples began migrating out of the north Asian steppes many thousands of years ago in all directions. Some Aryans ended up in the Fertile Crescent (including the ancient Persians). But other Aryans went elsewhere. All of the White (Aryan) peoples have common ancestral roots and similar biological makeup, relatively speaking, in contrast with the much larger interracial differences between Aryans and non-Aryans. The only possible reason for why Aryan would cause someone to be booted from an MSN chat room is a political reason: the Jews, or their partisans, don't want White peoples to realize that they are all one nation, one kindred. They fear the prospect of White unity, and the MSN automatic kick procedure is one manifestation of that fear.

Please wait...connecting to server.
Connected to server.
Welcome to MSN Chat. Important: MSN does not control or endorse the content, messages or information found in chat. MSN specifically disclaims any liability with regard to these areas. To review the guidelines for use of MSN Chat, go to http://chat.msn.com/conduct.asp [msn.com].
The chat's topic is: Talk about up-to-the-minute news

                Guest_FromTheRight : We didnt get no snow here..
                yettobee : and all of it is on top of about 5 in of ICE
                Guest_FromTheRight :
                                hobo542 has joined the conversation.
                lilbunnytheonly : yew, yet
                JerryAbbott : hi folks. there's something i forgot to do.
                _Blaze4 : Hello hobo
                Freakin386 : calm down Lil
                JerryAbbott : This is a test. Jewish.
                lilbunnytheonly : huh
                lilbunnytheonly : lol
                Guest_nightridder : THA BLOCK IS HOTT
                JerryAbbott : This is a test. Aryan.
                SandSwimmer : happy new year from London!!!
                Host News_Bot kicked JerryAbbott out of the chat room: Please watch your language!
                                JerryAbbott has left the conversation.

Question: Do you think that these goddamned Jews and liberals should occupy any position of real government authority over you? If not, then what are you going to do about it? Here's a hint: Voting for conservative candidates in elections isn't going to get the job done. Conservatism is not a cure to the disease loose in our land. First of all, there's too little left worth conserving, and, second, conservatives lose battles by halves Ã" that is, by successive compromises with their enemies. The compromises come one after another, but the controversy is always at the liberals' instigation, meaning that the conservative always loses something. Maybe not much with each compromise, but, over the years, the leftists gain and the gains accumulate. The conservatives adjust, again and again, to the new status quo.

As a result, conservatism today is much, much different from what it was 50 years ago, and today's conservatives wouldn't want to be caught espousing the "racist" views of the conservatives of back then. In other words, the liberals beat them, one little step at the time. The liberals can't gain what they aim for because their goals are based on a false conception of man and Nature. But they can sure wreck civilization, and conservatives aren't ideologically equipped to stop them. A revolutionary force, which liberals are, requires a revolutionary opponent, and that's where nationalism comes in.

The organization that I belong to, the National Alliance, is a White nationalist group. Our major task at the moment is publishing materials, mostly books, magazines and music, that will educate ordinary White people about the political realities that are hidden from them, in the hope that enough of them will awaken from their apathy in time to save themselves and their race. If you are a White person over 18 years old, then you may be eligible to join us.