Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Also cannot reply to the article, so I'll just rep (Score 1) 237

Hi,

-1-

Whoa .. why is the summary not displayed in its entirety? I'm in South Africa, and although our bandwidth speeds are good, latency is always high to the US. That means we want as much on one page as possible.

I really don't want to click through to read the whole summary, that's what the summary is for - to help me decide if I want to click through or not. We need to see the whole summary on the main page.

-2-

Why is the font bigger and the spacing almost double what is was? It just wastes space and makes reading more difficult. Imagine of book/newspaper printers started doing that! Yuck. At least give us a "compact" option like GMail did.

-3-

Why are the comments squished in between the large white space boxes on the left side of the browser? Yes, I have a wide screen, but no, I do not run my browser maximized. There are LARGE bits of white space separating the comment trees - why? In fact, why use boxes at all to create the tree? Just make a tree on the left and keep white space to a minimum.

Also, when scrolling down far enough, the right-hand content dries up and there's nothing but a large EXPANSE of empty white space. It's like the Sahara desert. It's not fun.

-4-

Why throw away the UID of the user? UID indicates (sort-of) age of the user. The UID is an important part of Slashdot history. Where'd the journal / homepage links go?

-5-

In an ever-increasing march to loosing vertical resolution to horizontal resolution, why on EARTH would you further reduce vertical space by pinning a menu to the top of the page? Please, leave our precious vertical space alone.

-6-

Where did the lovely titles go? It's just plain old text now - I'd really prefer the white-text-on-green titles. It's Many times easier on the eye.

-7-

Where did the hidden comments go? How are we supposed to (on a whim) decide to read a below-threshold comment instead of lowering the global threshold?

-8-

Why is the comment box so darn narrow now? I can hardly fit in 12 words next to each other!

I'm praying that you keep the classic version around, that I way I will stay around in the community too!

--deckert_za

Idle

Submission + - Best. Geek. Wedding. Invitation. Ever. (createdigitalmusic.com)

kfogel writes: "Karen Sandler (a lawyer at the Software Freedom Law Center) and Mike Tarantino (a professional musician) are getting married in May. They've sent out the coolest wedding invitation ever: a beautifully packaged flexidisc record where the invitation itself is the record player. That's right: It's paper! And it plays a record! The song itself was written by Mike, is performed by Karen and Mike together, and FTW is released under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license. The person who designed the invitations — a friend of the couple's — has blogged about it. It's also made Make Magazine, Mashable, and Geek.com."
Power

Submission + - Solar Breakthrough Could Make Solar Cells Obsolete (inhabitat.com) 2

An anonymous reader writes: Researchers at the University of Michigan have made a discovery about the behavior of light that could change solar technology forever. Stephen Rand, a professor in the departments of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Physics and Applied Physics and William Fisher, a doctoral student in applied physics, discovered that light, when traveling at the right intensity through a material such as glass that does not conduct electricity, can create magnetic fields that are 100 million times stronger than previously thought possible. In these conditions, the resulting magnetic field is strong enough to rival a strong electric effect. The result is an “optical battery, which could lead to “a new kind of solar cell without semiconductors and without absorption to produce charge separation”, according to Rand.
Google

Bing Users' Click-Through Rate 55% Higher Than Google Users' 268

An anonymous reader writes "Techcrunch is running a story that shows some pretty significant differences in the clicking habits of users of Yahoo, Google, and Bing. As it turns out, folks who arrive at websites via Bing are 55% more likely to click on an ad than if they arrived from Google (data based on the Chitika network). Essentially, people who use Bing are far more susceptible to advertising. Bing has acquired a decent market share in such a short time, but could it just be that they've reaped the low hanging fruit of those particularly persuaded by advertising? When their huge marketing campaign winds down, what kind of staying power will it have?"

Slashdot Top Deals

Long computations which yield zero are probably all for naught.

Working...