Re:DRM is pointless (Score 1)

What hasn't been demonstrated is that new artists can establish their careers in a world of freely downloadable content. It's OK for Radiohead and George Michael to try download-only experiments because a) they can afford to release an album that makes no income, and b) they're not trying to establish a career. This isn't to say the DRM helps at all, but there must be some way to protect the artist. I have not seen anyone propose a workable business model other than "funded by advertising".