Comment Re:Kylix? (Score 1) 531
Most of this stuff I can do with interfaces, including multiple inheritance or are not language features that make a *big* deference (like operator overloading, althoug that would be really nice to have).
I would also like to have language constructs for generic programming but not with the text replacment *thingy* c++ uses, I'd rather wait a while longer.
BTW, I still havent read a c++ book with stuff in it I could not implement in OP. I read c++ books often specially concerning patterns.
What do you mean by "hardcore"? Do you mean {}!=, etc... instead of begin end not and etc..., I hope not, this kind of "hardcore" stuff would only impress your little sister.
And what do you mean almost nor crashes or memleaks! LOL! Almost is not good enough:)
I would also like to have language constructs for generic programming but not with the text replacment *thingy* c++ uses, I'd rather wait a while longer.
BTW, I still havent read a c++ book with stuff in it I could not implement in OP. I read c++ books often specially concerning patterns.
What do you mean by "hardcore"? Do you mean {}!=, etc... instead of begin end not and etc..., I hope not, this kind of "hardcore" stuff would only impress your little sister.
And what do you mean almost nor crashes or memleaks! LOL! Almost is not good enough:)
