Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Efficacy of police stop-and-question interactions? (Score 1) 372

Are there any studies that look at the efficacy of police stops? That is, how useful are these opportunistic police efforts to stop and question someone, in terms of preventing crime? The FBI Director's claim relies on a belief that spontaneous stop-and-question interactions are responsible for preventing an extremely significant percentage of violent crimes.

Comment Re:Yes, they work very well (Score 1) 139

For all of the goodness of the above extended comment, it misses some important marks:

DKIM assigns a validated identifier to a message. It does /not/ tell you who "sent" the message, in the sense that folk normally mean. The validated identifier, for example, does not have to have anything to do with the message author or the originating organization. However once a message reliably has a validated identifier, then that identifier can be used to build a noise-free reputation. The DKIM identifier can't be used by unauthorized actors.

DMARC links the DKIM and/or SPF identifier to the domain of the author (rfc2822.From) field AND it can declare the domain owner's preference for what receivers should do with mail that has that domain in the From: field but doesn't get DMARC validation. Receivers are free to conform to that guidance or do whatever else they deem appropriate.

The underlying point here is that these mechanisms work best at identifying valid mail and at letting receivers build up reliable reputations for the domains using these mechanisms.

IMO all of the uses of these mechanisms for identifying bad messages and bad actors represent a near-term, transient artifact, because it is still much too easy for bad actors to "route around" these mechanisms. And the major lesson of the last 20 years of fighting email abuse is that bad actors are very adaptable.

Comment DVD player with Netflix (Score 1) 165

Besides Internet-only devices and Internet-enabled televisions, many DVD players are now Internet-enabled and include such things as Netflix access with a single button -- often a physical button on the device. This has the advantage of starting with a device and mode already familiar to older folk, although of course there are still some steps to learn. My 94-year-old father is not facile with his, but he gets it to work. d/

Comment Asking for equity (Score 1) 349

Agreeing with a number of postings: Start by offering your positive assessment of the company, your enthusiasm for the company's future and your feeling that your work has contributed to the current good status. (Of course, touting one's own contribution needs delicacy, but no, it's not wrong to cite it.) Note that you are feeling a responsibility to continue to help the company to succeed. State that you would like to share some of the risk and benefit of the company's good future by participating in the equity plan. As others have noted, this can -- and usually does -- involve a tradeoff with other compensation. Higher pay means less stock. Also as already noted, the company's having matured already means that it is likely the stock price and the amount available to folk such as you won't be as wonderful as founder's shares. You probably do not know any details of the company's stock plan, so you should state openness about what the package of stock should be. But this is a negotiation and you want to cast it positively and flexibly. Before pursuing this, you need to consider what your reaction will be to being turned down. Will it sour your relationship to the company? Good luck. d/

Slashdot Top Deals

If at first you don't succeed, you are running about average.

Working...