Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
Security

Internet of Things Set To Change the Face of Dementia Care (theguardian.com) 58

The internet of things, also known as connected things, have been in the news lately for all the wrong reasons, but that doesn't mean they are utterly rubbish. Smart bottles that dispense the correct dose of medication at the correct time, for instance, coupled with digital assistants, and chairs that know how long you've sat in them are among the devices set to change the face of care for those living with dementia. From a report on The Guardian: While phone calls and text messages help to keep people in touch, says Idris Jahn, head of health and data at IoTUK, a program within the government-backed Digital Catapult, problems can still arise, from missed appointments to difficulties in taking medication correctly. But he adds, connected sensors and devices that collect and process data in real time could help solve the problem. "For [people living with dementia] the sensors would be more in the environment itself, so embedded into the plug sockets, into the lights -- so it is effectively invisible. You carry on living your life but in the background things will monitor you and provide feedback to people who need to know," he said. "That might be your carer, it might be your family, it might be your clinician." The approach, he added, has the potential to change the way care is given. "It is having that cohesive mechanism to put everyone into the loop, which I think hasn't existed in the past and it is something that people need."

Comment Re:Why all the Safari/Apple hate ?... (Score 1) 311

I didn't say anything about adoption rate as a whole. I was commenting on this specific statement "Looking around at a room of IT specialists, the only ones with a Mac are middle managers. This is why we dislike it, it's a product designed to keep the user occupied, not to enable the user to be productive."

Please, do try to keep up.

Comment Re:Why all the Safari/Apple hate ?... (Score 4, Informative) 311

As a 42 year old system engineer (*nix) I can say your inexperience is showing. There hasn't been a company I've worked for who didn't have a plethora of Macs in the hands of the developers, SysAdmins *and* managers.

Most of our linux admins? Macs.

Half our Windows admins? Macs.

1/4 of our developers? Macs.

Went to a couple Puppet conferences. Most of the laptops? Macs.

etc, etc, etc.

The rest of your comment is pure applesauce.

Comment MIcrosoft *is* to blame for the virus? (Score 1) 424

I think so. example: a car company creates a car(Windows) that under certain conditions causes the brakes to fail (macros written badly). Once the defect is made public, or proven, it is fixed. Many times, a recall takes place. The product is 'fixed', sometimes those who have had loss due to the flaw recieve some sort of compensation. The people who drove the car(users) are not blamed, even if they know they shouldnt recreate the condition that causes the malfunction(education). The person who 'created' the condition isnt to blame(virus writer), this condition doesnt affect other vehicles(Linux, MacOS, etc). Only those who created the vehicle (Windows) are to blame(Microsoft). The released a faulty, vulnerable product. Why should it be any different in the OS industry? This process is a standard everywhere except the 'Intellectual Property' industry. Why?

Slashdot Top Deals

Profanity is the one language all programmers know best.

Working...