You are ignoring reality in both the demographics of most illegal immigrants, hyperbolic reporting, and the overall very low rate of incidence of citizens being detained for *immigration* issues.
Note that your own (vague, and deliberately misrepresentational) article obliquely notes that 130 of that 170 citizens were detained after interfering, that leaves just 40 out of tens of thousands - and the government must address and be held responsible for those errors and alleged abuses - but that's hardly jack-booted thuggery.
Good grief child, read the decision and stop spewing stupidity.
You don't understand the law or the reality.
Public is public. The government can face-scan you just like I can take a picture of you.
Immigrants are subject to identification requirements whenever/wherever, period.
Illegal immigrants have no constitutional protections or rights.
A previous administration attempted to force asylum seekers to wait their turn for a hearing outside the country.
This is pretty much the same in every country, and for those that didn't have those rules - well you can see how well that's worked out.
But in order for this to make a dent, it will need to be scaled up to remove billions, not hundreds of thousands, of metric tons of carbon per year, Yale associate professor of earth and planetary sciences Matthew Eisaman said...
In the long run, every program becomes rococco, and then rubble. -- Alan Perlis