Comment Re:Read the Article. Bunk!! (Score 1) 478
What? You're using a lot of "you" this and "you" that. I didn't say or imply much of what you're replying to. Don't give me some crap about opening my eyes, when I didn't build the straw man your knocking down.
That article I posted is what it is. But I know people that worked there. I know the concrete in the reactor was substandard -- with holes and fissures. Three mile island may have doomed the project. . but it had LOTS of problems beyond just "lawyers".
Really. But keep on crying foul. And tell me this thing, that is just 30 years old, is something you'd like in your backyard burning nuclear fuel. The costs are high, because if it screws up, the consequences are high.
I'm not denying it can't be done right. But clearly you're going to have to deal with people that remember things like Marble Hill -- besides berating them and brow beating them with your "degree".
http://www.satellite-sightseer.com/id/8998/United_States/Indiana/New_Washington/Marble_Hill_Nuclear_Power_Plant
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marble_Hill_Nuclear_Power_Plant
That article I posted is what it is. But I know people that worked there. I know the concrete in the reactor was substandard -- with holes and fissures. Three mile island may have doomed the project. . but it had LOTS of problems beyond just "lawyers".
Really. But keep on crying foul. And tell me this thing, that is just 30 years old, is something you'd like in your backyard burning nuclear fuel. The costs are high, because if it screws up, the consequences are high.
I'm not denying it can't be done right. But clearly you're going to have to deal with people that remember things like Marble Hill -- besides berating them and brow beating them with your "degree".
http://www.satellite-sightseer.com/id/8998/United_States/Indiana/New_Washington/Marble_Hill_Nuclear_Power_Plant
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marble_Hill_Nuclear_Power_Plant
