Comment Fukushima (Score 1) 184
The reduction was a response to the Fukushima disaster. It was a bad decision made for good but misguided reasons. What they should have done was learn from the mistakes of Fukushima, not give up on nuclear.
The reduction was a response to the Fukushima disaster. It was a bad decision made for good but misguided reasons. What they should have done was learn from the mistakes of Fukushima, not give up on nuclear.
And nearly a third of US states have banned it or are trying to. Not because it's dangerous -- because it threatens something deeper than food safety.
They banned it because it competes with the existing commercial meat industry in those states. Governments don't ban foods just because they taste bad.
Physics is physics. A small injury may indeed have been preferable to the other possible outcomes.
It was a nice ride but it wasn't allowed to go on the highway so the trip took longer.
Now we just need some mutations and we can live in the dystopia of Shadowrun.
Why should those rights be limited to physical objects?
The students deserve better. Java is a terrible instructional language.
Two acceptable solution states does not imply that the program should produce both of them.
This test is worthless. It's too focused on implementation details. This is not a Computer Science test. It's a Java test. It's forcing the student down one narrow path to implement the solution in a very particular way. It's a free-form format, but there is no test of analytical ability other than to parse the question itself.
If you're going to test computer science the questions should be more along the lines of "Which data structure do you believe would be most appropriate for representing a box of candy and why?"
Work related VPNs are different. They are owned by the company you work for to protect their data, which is a legitimate use of VPNs. This article is talking about 3rd party VPNs.
Oh the humanity!
If you live in a dense city, you do not carry 6 bags full of groceries around. Grocery stores are within walking distance. You don't need to stock up for a month at a time. You just get what you need when you need it. Delivery is far more viable as well.
That's not true. A game where no draw condition exists will never end in a draw.
Here are the possible end states for a two player solved game with two perfect players, A and B:
a) the game will always end in a draw
b) player A will always win
c) player B will always win
d) the game will never end
Yeah, I think this is the main point. It seems like the requirements to get a
Those who do things in a noble spirit of self-sacrifice are to be avoided at all costs. -- N. Alexander.