Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
Operating Systems

MoBo Manufacturer Foxconn Refuses To Support Linux 696

Noodlenose notes a thread up on the Ubuntu forums, where a user is questioning the practices of hardware manufacturer Foxconn. The user describes how his new Foxconn motherboard caused his Linux install to freeze and fire off weird kernel errors. He disassembles the BIOS and concludes that a faulty DSDT table is responsible for the errors. Even though the user makes Foxconn aware of the problem, they refuse to correct it, as 'it doesn't support Linux' and is only 'Microsoft certified.' The user speculates darkly on Foxconn's motives. Read the forum, read the code, and come to your own conclusions. "I disassembled my BIOS to have a look around, and while I won't post the results here, I'll tell you what I did find. They have several different tables, a group for Windows XP and Vista, a group for 2000, a group for NT, Me, 95, 98, etc. that just errors out, and one for LINUX. The one for Linux points to a badly written table that does not correspond to the board's ACPI implementation.' The worst part is Foxconn's insistence that the product is ACPI compliant because their tables passed to Windows work, and that Microsoft gave the the magic WHQL certification."

Comment Re:why hasn't anyone just found out for themselves (Score 1) 226

Yes, the info is available to anyone with a search engine, but a relatively simple script can put the inforation in a coherent, organized, readable format, including specifics on each patent that would normally take a while to navigate through.

So I read post after post by people that are completely in the dark about what exactly Microsoft has patents on, how much legal ground they have to make such accusations, and read people asking, one after another, for specifics. I try to provide some (what i consider disturbing) information a friend of mine acquired (and information on how someone can acquire it themselves) and the second I do, the responses change from, "where's the proof?" to "no shit Sherlock".

Basically, I was just trying to point out that M$ IS in fact talking about patents on processes (not just code), to let some folks know what M$ has up their sleeve (which I found kinda scary!), and encourage people to go do some research on their own...and for that I got labeled a troll, a drama queen, and a stupid cock monkey.

Right on /.

Sorry if I pissed anyone off, but I wasn't trying to troll or spread FUD on behalf of Microsoft, or anything remotely close to it. Quite the contrary, I was just trying to provide specifics on how to find some relevant info, and actually dispel some FUD through knowledge and information. I didn't think that would ever provoke such a reaction, here of all places.
My bad. srsly.

Slashdot Top Deals

Many people are unenthusiastic about their work.

Working...