
Since there are no moving parts, there is no difference in latency for reading different sectors. This is the reason you simply don't care about fragmentation. Regarding limitations on lifespan, there are many systems using SSD for databases indexes, where the index is updated hundredth times a day and the drive is specified to work for several years.
from personal experience, the build process is limited by I/O capabilities, and this is where the SSD is just way beyond any mechanical disk. Real life performance information give about 100 IOPS for Fiber channel / SAS disks, and 80 IOPS for SATA disks. for SSD the numbers go up to 5,000 IOPS - about 50 times increase.
This just proves that being a monopoly allows you to ignore your users.
Excel is a major tool in many corporates, and having such an exploit can make havoc.
no the least, this shows that making your own rules can help you claim whatever you want - time to fix / number of vulnerabilities, etc.
- what are the most busy bands in term of actual usage.
- what is the strength of the interfering AP's.
- what is the actual SNR for your computer in the locations you work normally.
having this information you can use some of the methods above:
- directional antenna
- selecting the correct frequency
- setting the power
changing to a band can be an interesting idea but its more expensive than the others.
Daniel
I cannot conceive that anybody will require multiplications at the rate of 40,000 or even 4,000 per hour ... -- F. H. Wales (1936)