Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 


Forgot your password?
Close
typodupeerror
Check out the new SourceForge HTML5 internet speed test! No Flash necessary and runs on all devices. ×

Comment Re:Colorado Repeater Map (Score 1) 376

by d-ude (#33023724) Attached to: Amateur Radio In the Backcountry?

There was a solar-powered repeater operated by a local club on top of a mountain, broadcasting at 100 watts.

You mean transmitting at 100 watts. It is illegal to broadcast on amateur frequencies except under very limited conditions.

Semantics. To the muggles it means the same thing.

Communications

Amateur Radio In the Backcountry? 376

Posted by kdawson from the ham-on-the-hoof dept.
bartle writes "I spend a lot of time hiking in the Colorado Rockies. Cell phone reception is very unreliable and I'm curious if carrying a small amateur radio would make any sense at all. I don't want to add too much weight to my pack; from what I gather, a radio weighing a pound would give me at most 5 to 10 watts of transmitting power. I have no idea if this is enough to be effective in a mountainous region, and I'm hoping some experienced Slashdot hams could give me a clue. I'm only interested in acquiring a radio and license if it is a lot more effective and reliable than the cell phone I already carry. Otherwise I'll just wait for Globalstar to bring back their duplex service and buy a next-generation SPOT messaging device. (I know some Slashdotters will want to suggest a modern SPOT or Personal Locator Beacon; these are suitable for the worst kinds of emergencies, but I'll point out that reliable communication can help prevent small crises from becoming big ones.) Are small amateur radios effective in the field, or are vehicle rigs really the only way to go? Or am I better off just waiting for satellite?"

Slashdot Top Deals

To thine own self be true. (If not that, at least make some money.)

Close