Comment Dvorak, you kill me (Score 2, Insightful) 440
Apple doing dual PPC/X86 machines for backward compatibility?
who are we, AMIGA?
let's just throw a 68040 in there too so i can run OS6.
and Itanium? won't those cost a little much for an iMac?
he completely leaves out the IBM solution when mentioning the Moto fued. Power4 baby, that's the future. maybe G5s in the iMacs and iBooks to throw Moto a bone.
but Intels? why would they invest in an architecture which from what i understand, is hitting a ceiling in performance?
haven't they made changes which make the itanium more like a PPC in the way it operates? well, we're already there.
who are we, AMIGA?
let's just throw a 68040 in there too so i can run OS6.
and Itanium? won't those cost a little much for an iMac?
he completely leaves out the IBM solution when mentioning the Moto fued. Power4 baby, that's the future. maybe G5s in the iMacs and iBooks to throw Moto a bone.
but Intels? why would they invest in an architecture which from what i understand, is hitting a ceiling in performance?
haven't they made changes which make the itanium more like a PPC in the way it operates? well, we're already there.
