Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:Tron 1.0 (Score 1) 412

I don't think it's just you, I had the exact same experience. It's not that it's a _bad_ movie, per se, but the beginning is very jumpy, and there are so many gratuitous shots that really slow the movie down. The graphics are very impressive for their time, but the pacing and plot left a lot to be desired. In fact, that's exactly how I felt about the new movie (minus the pacing concerns).
Medicine

Court Rules Against Vaccine-Autism Claims Again 416

barnyjr writes "According to a story from Reuters, 'Vaccines that contain a mercury-based preservative called thimerosal cannot cause autism on their own, a special US court ruled on Friday, dealing one more blow to parents seeking to blame vaccines for their children's illness. The special US Court of Federal Claims ruled that vaccines could not have caused the autism of an Oregon boy, William Mead, ending his family's quest for reimbursement. ... While the state court determined the autism was vaccine-related, [Special Master George] Hastings said overwhelming medical evidence showed otherwise. The theory presented by the Meads and experts who testified on their behalf "was biologically implausible and scientifically unsupported," Hasting wrote.'"

Comment I don't understand (Score 5, Informative) 88

It isn't clear to me what the rationale for getting rid of the Space Station would be. As far as I can tell, if you didn't want to pay for shipping people up and down, you could still use it as a platform for scientific instruments. In that case, you would just have to occasionally use orbital corrections to compensate for atmospheric drag. So why deorbit it, ever? Is the cost of a few kilo's of propellant really that high? If you're talking about removing the crew that's one thing, but that's an incredible resource that you'd just be wasting.
Software

Fixing Bugs, But Bypassing the Source Code 234

shreshtha contributes this snippet from MIT's Technology Review: "Martin Rinard, a professor of computer science at MIT, is unabashed about the ultimate goal of his group's research: 'delivering an immortal, invulnerable program.' In work presented this month at the ACM Symposium on Operating Systems Principles in Big Sky, MT, his group has developed software that can find and fix certain types of software bugs within a matter of minutes." Interestingly, this software doesn't need access to the source code of the target program.

Comment Seashore (Score 1) 270

So it depends on what your priorities are. If you care about a breadth of features then GIMP.app is what you need. However, if you're more interested in an open source Photoshop-like app then I'd suggest Seashore (http://seashore.sourceforge.net/). It has all of the basic photo editing features that PS has, but does lack some key features (such as CYMK support). However, it's fully Cocoa so it's really more integrated with the OS than even Photoshop (which is all Carbon, at least CS3 and CS4 are, supposedly CS5 will be Cocoa). It's great for all of the basic stuff you need if you want a true Mac OS X experience, without having to use X11.

Slashdot Top Deals

"If I do not want others to quote me, I do not speak." -- Phil Wayne

Working...