Comment Re:Virtually unchallenged? (Score 1) 221
What's so different about this Samsung compared to the range of Archos Android devices like the 43it (I don't care about Android myself so at a guess there are plenty of other devices out there)? Is the "virtually unchallenged" moniker in any way warranted?
I hate to be a troll, but this comment will inevitably be just that...
The reason why is:
Because Archos will forever be the Tech world's underdog
Because I have never seen Archos actually try and market a device (just their fan base)
Because Samsung's marketing department is undoubtedly superior.
If no one ever heard of it, no one will buy it. I constantly keep tabs on gadget/tech news and releases and I have never heard of this device. And trust me, I have been looking out for a device like this for a long time now. How would you expect the general public to ever find out. I've never used an Archos product myself, so I can't say anything either way. They could be some of the most amazing gadgets ever (and many have claimed they are). But they remain virtually unknown.
Comment Re:Virtually unchallenged? (Score 1) 221
Comment Re:Developer's Choice (Score 5, Informative) 196
What good is your old phone without a contract?
The cell providers make you sign the same contract whether you buy a phone or not. Wouldn't they have an interest in keeping you using the same phone for longer? I don't understand why more carriers don't sell more open phones
You don't have to renew your contract to continue your service. That's a common misconception. Most carriers will continue to give you service once the contract is up. That's why they offer to upgrade your phone every time your contract is nearing an end, because that becomes an incentive for you to sign into a new contract.
Comment Re:Go Apple! (Score 1) 338
I think we should just let Apple run their business. It's not like you can't pull up the documents on your web browser either. If they start restricting content there, then there's something to worry about! Meanwhile, let them control the user experience as much as they want. It seems to be working seeing as tons of people swear by their iOS devices!
I'd like to add that I'm not an Apple fanboy. I don't currently own any Apple devices. I do use iTunes sometimes to help manage my library and I once owned an iPod Nano for a period of four months and then I got something that I liked better.
Comment Re:and... (Score 1) 661
Comment Re:demo please? (Score 1) 171
And it has digital output... through the scanner on my all-in-one printer.
I'm not sure if you are being sarcastic, but using that logic so does paper. If this could save the page you wrote so you can bring it back up later, it would make a make a very useful tool for taking notes in class.
Because of it's limitations, I would not call this tablet practical. For a lot less money, I could just buy myself a small white board that would serve the same purpose.
Comment Re:Ummmm...it's 'overseas' (Score 1) 143
Comment Re:Mines a vodka and red bull... (Score 0, Redundant) 398
Comment SuperGenPass (Score 1) 1007
Comment Re:Goodbye cursed Silverlight (Score 1) 145
Comment Re:ok, so I'll get one then. (Score 1) 145
I have yet to see a DVD player that doesn't pause when going between layers. Just a fault in the technology itself. I wouldn't be surprised if the PS3 still did this with the dual layer DVDs that you own.
"I don't have a blueray player yet. I know, what year is it?"
Well, it's 2009 and nobody I know has a Blu-ray player. It's just not getting adopted at a fast rate, so don't feel bad.
Comment Re:Yeah, like that will work. (Score 1) 650
Comment Re:Yeah, like that will work. (Score 1) 650
While I agree with a lot of what you said... remember that not everybody gets their copy of Windows with a new computer. Some people buy a retail copy of Windows of the shelf to install it in their existing computers, while others (like I have in the past) buy OEM copies of the OS from online vendors.
In which case, you will have an OS shipping without a browser, which is pretty ridiculous.
Comment Re:Still could be innocent (Score 1) 1523
Maybe he was angry with her because she was having an affair. He bought a gun out of anger, but didn't want to kill her. He goes home, to find her with her lover. In a struggle with the lover, the lover the lover wrests the gun from Hans. He's got the gun pointed at Hans, who reveals that his wife has in fact ANOTHER lover. In anger, the lover shoots Nina and flees. Hans has no idea who he was, and Nina dies sadly in his arms. The only way he can avoid blame for the murder (having just legally purchased the gun) is to bury Nina himself. In the end, Hans feels responsible for her death, having driven her away from him due to his obsession with work, and of course, the foolish decision to buy the guy. He sees only too late that he should forgiven her for such a minor human flaw, and if he had, then he would still be with her.
That's quite the soap opera there! While not entirely impossible, it is quite a stretch. To me it's more likely that he probably killed her. Although, it is true that it makes absolutely no sense that he claims to be innocent while also claiming to know where her body is...