Example 1: The NSA giving OpenSSL a backdoor, and nobody noticing, for years.
Example 2: http://www.underhanded-c.org/
Example 3: Wikipedia is not "anyone can edit" anymore.
There, fixed it. Three examples where a good approach failed don’t show that it always fails or that it can’t be improved
It seems more and more that "AI" is just any software package the researchers don't understand (or don't want to explain to VCs).
Well, TFA does say "machine learning", which, admittedly, sound less sexy than "AI". Saying we've just used an 85-line Python script to train a model from scikit sounds even more boring. What's even more annoying: why is this article behind a $8.99 paywall??
It would be great if this stayed open for good. There must be some other business model that would support the ACM without having to lock their knowledge up.
Couldn't agree more. Putting scientific research behind a paywall doesn't help research very much. Is it too much to dream of Google Scholar or Microsoft Academic Search showing all abstracts and full-text PDFs for all research?
Refreshed by a brief blackout, I got to my feet and went next door. -- Martin Amis, _Money_