Eindbazen ebctf sources on github

Firefox and Chrome extension to see how much you are worth are available @ https://team.inria.fr/privatics/yourvalue/
FF plugin directly from Mozilla: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/rtbwatcher/

statistics so far from http://yourvalue.inrialpes.fr/
Average price of users $0.001200
Price of the cheapest user $0.000076
Price of the most expensive user $0.008000

You can also pay with Bitcoin.
EFF donate

These tests evaluate the impact of anti-virus software on system performance, as programs running in background – such as real time protection antivirus software -
  AV-comparatives performance chart
For more in depth see:
  Performance-Test (AV) May 2013 PDF

NOD32 is very fast, its core is written in assembly. source from NOD32, see performance

I can recommend Palemoon.instead of Waterfox.
Its compiled for new (SSE2) cpu's and some "redundant and optional code" is disabled.

http://www.cdrinfo.com/Sections/Reviews/Home.aspx
http://www.myce.com/review/
I have an ihas 324, performs well with EAC. See reviews at above sites.

An ad blocker isn't an adequate solution for 0-day drive-by downloads. Use Noscript (firefox) or Notscripts (Chrome). It's like an internet condom.

The Chinese characters on the site mean "A friend in need is a friend indeed"
The song playing (for those who don't know) is Teenage Wasteland by the Who.

https://twitter.com/#!/AnonymousChina

A quote from an engineer who used to work for AMD

What did happen is that management decided there SHOULD BE such cross-engineering ,which meant we had to stop hand-crafting our CPU designs and switch to an SoC design style. This results in giving up a lot of performance, chip area, and efficiency. The reason DEC Alphas were always much faster than anything else is they designed each transistor by hand. Intel and AMD had always done so at least for the critical parts of the chip. That changed before I left - they started to rely on synthesis tools, automatic place and route tools, etc. I had been in charge of our design flow in the years before I left, and I had tested these tools by asking the companies who sold them to design blocks (adders, multipliers, etc.) using their tools. I let them take as long as they wanted. They always came back to me with designs that were 20% bigger, and 20% slower than our hand-crafted designs, and which suffered from electromigration and other problems.
That is now how AMD designs chips. I'm sure it will turn out well for them [/sarcasm]

source: http://forums.macrumors.com/showpost.php?p=9746191&postcount=619

more:
http://www.insideris.com/amd-spreads-propaganda-ex-employee-speaks-out/

Related reading: http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/ssd-reliability-failure-rate,2923.html
It features statistics from different data centers on the failure rate of SSD's.

That you are aware of. Most censoring will not show a "this has been blocked" page but just a server not found / page not found error.

Differences in code between OpenVPN and OpenVPN-NL. (credits: Palatinux) openvpn_nl-v2.1.4-diffpatch.txt

About why the chose to use PolarSSL:
Among the notable differences between OpenVPN and OpenVPN-NL is the cryptographic library. Correct SSL functionality is essential for the protection that OpenVPN offers. OpenSSL is a large and complex library. PolarSSL is a compact and modular library, which is small enough for a fairly in-depth evaluation. Therefore, in the OpenVPN-NL package, it has been chosen to exchange PolarSSL for OpenSSL. This change does not change functionality; the two libraries (OpenSSL and PolarSSL) are mutually compatible.
source: background OpenVPN
But as being said in another comment, someone now working for Fox-IT was involved in PolarSSL. Extra functionality and documentation was added to PolarSSL by Fox-IT according to a comment on a tech-site (tweakers.net) by someone who claims to be the maintainer of PolarSSL.