I'd be alright with it if they also treated the Bill of Rights like the Prime Directive.

The big difference here is, these three hypothetical people will not be facing a three-year sentence.

conduct which is likely to or capable of facilitating terrorism

our big existential threat is terrorism

Pick up a feather.

How do they know who is a US citizen and who isn't?

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

Minority parties need to get at least 7% of the ‘first preference’ vote and be able to agree to an ‘exchange of preferences’* with other minority parties to have a chance at a seat in the Senate.

Strong, Valiant Korean 11G network

your original question asked the OP to test God as an hypothesis, which you recognize is absurd.

God is an axiom, exactly like the idea that science can work at all.

You can collect evidence supporting them, but not disproving them.

Solipsism

Do you realize that science relies on logic, logic relies on sets of axioms, and axioms can't be disproved by empirical evidence, only by inconsistencies in the formal system?

The existence of $DEITY$ can't be proven nor disproven by empiric data, because it's a logically consistent system.

How would you disprove that the COBE prediction is proof of the Will of God?

FYI I'm an atheist, but in my day I did my duty learning a bit about philosophy of science.

The same way you tested the hypothesis that empirical methods can discover regular, universal laws; and with equivalent results.

We start from the definition of God being the creator of the universe.

And a grant of immunity from prosecution for conspiracy would eliminate that privilege, no?