For some people, environmentalism is a religion. Does that help make sense of the letter?
That said, I do believe the wealthiest nations (one of which I reside in) should bear the brunt of the costs of cleaning things up, both for moral and pragmatic reasons.
So
Producing enough of these is simply a matter of will. I don't have the information to determine if they are a net benefit, but production isn't an insurmountable issue. I don't completely trust the numbers from the supporters or the detractors since both have a horse in the race, but if I was forced to bet on something, it would be that some type of human-made carbon-capture technology is going to be a significant part of the solution.
The Covid Tracking Project from The Atlantic actually recommends using absolute numbers to report deaths, rather than per capita, because that's too confusing to people: https://covidtracking.com/abou.... Because Florida's ~2K deaths (out of 22 million population) are directly comparable to Louisiana's 2.5K deaths (4.6 million pop). But I don't disagree with how they came to that conclusion.
That's after recommending using normalized values at the top of the same document.
It's not an issue.
Then why write an article about it.
Perhaps because this is news to Hollywood? To those us us who long-ago discovered non-US entertainment, yeah, it's not news.
Actual data:
That's what? An order of magnitude difference? Pretty close to the 1/11th you claim is bunkum.
The best comedy is based on uncomfortable truths.
And yes, I'm aware Banana Republic and Gap are the same company.
The Fujitsu palm scanners do just that (look for blood flow that is), or at least claim to. When I worked with those scanners, I always idly wondered just how difficult it would be to take the image, use a 3d printer to make a fake hand with veins and then pump some sort fluid through it to fool the system.
I also wondered about verifying the blood flow thing, but was never able to verify due to lack of access to a supply of corpse hands.
That's because while they might be hot shot programmers, they are crappy analysts.
I suspect that any grad student from a, "lessor" school, but had been trained in analyzing requirements correctly, this would not have happened. That's because they would have asked the most obvious question, who are the customers and what are their needs.
Failing to account for the work schedules of parents (the real customer ) is a 100,000 watt light sign proclaiming Inadequate Analysis.
I don't personally know either of the grad students, but I've corresponded via email with Sebastien, and I can say he seems like a decent, thoughtful guy who does in fact understand all the issues. If you had bothered to RTFA, you'd see that they ran their program multiple times with multiple criteria (thousands of times to be exact). The reality is, people just don't like change, even if you can demonstrate that a) the systems (jobs, businesses, etc.) will adjust to accommodate and b) things will be measurably improved after. It really was a political failure -- the program did exactly what it was required to do. The people who ordered the results failed to get the required buy-in from the public to implement those results.
If they wanted to find the optimums, they should have included the whole system and not just the least impactful part. The parents schedules are the most important ones since they are responsible for making it all happen; from breakfast to dinner to bedtime.
Well, the reason the parent's schedule is the way it is is because the school schedule is the way it is. When school systems shift their schedules, the rest of the system tends to adapt to it.
Disc space -- the final frontier!