Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re: What an Embarrassingly Vapid Article (Score 4, Interesting) 477

"Rush hour" will become an anachronistic misnomer, as driverless cars could move at open freeway speeds, even with (increasingly rare) high traffic density. This will make its first appearance in formerly-HOV lanes. I imagine watching cars travelling 65mph -- even when they're nearly bumper-to-bumper -- will make many logjammed drivers in the human/slow lanes think twice about their insistence on being in "control".

Comment Re: fathers (Score 5, Insightful) 299

As if the chasm between haves and the have-nots wasn't wide enough already... now lucking into a wealthy family will get the "born on 3rd base" advantages amplified by an order of magnitude.

Specific consequences are impossible to predict, but I susect the kind of permanent, intergenerational inequality this would engender would not make for a more peaceful planet.

As a cancer survivor (grade 4 GBMO), I am a natural mutant with a lot at stake. But altering genes to prevent disease is not the same thing as optimizing your progeny's IQ or height.

Comment Sure, but what about... (Score 1) 327

Lots of tears over Usenet, but what about Fidonet??

If a technology or mode of communication means soo much to us, then, given that Usenet is not owned by Comcast, what is to stop us from cooking up a free and useful solution that does work? If geeks created Usenet, why do we have to let Comcast "kill" it?

I know it is not an option everywhere, but I do know that where I live, we have more than Comcast as an option for ISP... if someone wants Usenet here, they can just vote with their feet and get a DSL line from Verizon or one of the local telcom providers. Speed may not be the same, but it is up to use to decide what is important - not Comcast. They can say, well we dropped Usenet, but speed is more important anyway... and we can say that, no, Usenet is more important, and switch ISPs.

Comment Re:I hope the Fraud is real (Score 1) 861

None of us has enough information to be sure, but I'm a betting man,
and I bet it's the same lying cheating frauds who handed Bush two consecutive ill-gotten "wins"
that are behind this.

The Republican machine stands to gain from a Clinton nomination,
because national polls show that while Obama would handily beat any Republican nominee,
Clinton would likely lose to any Republican candidate.

Here's hoping Obama can win anyway, and more importantly that the system be corrected for once and all,
the long-term viability of our democracy is at risk.

Amen to the calls for a manual recount, and for eliminating diebold from the mix, and for paper trails, etc.

Slashdot Top Deals

"Card readers? We don't need no stinking card readers." -- Peter da Silva (at the National Academy of Sciencies, 1965, in a particularly vivid fantasy)

Working...