Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Safari 3 vs. Firefox 2 and IE7 559

Bobcat writes "Ars Technica has a 'first look' at Safari for Windows, which is interesting because it's written from the perspective of someone new to Safari. It was tested against Firefox 2 and IE7 and aside from the slightly faster page loading, Ars didn't find much to recommend it to Windows users. 'The modest increase in rendering performance is hardly worth the deficiencies, and Safari's user interface simply doesn't provide the usability or flexibility of competing products. If the folks at Apple think that providing Windows users with a taste of Mac OS X through Safari is going to entice them to buy a Mac, it's going to take a better effort than the Safari 3 beta. Even if the final release is more polished and completely bug-free, it still won't be as powerful or feature-loaded as Opera or Firefox.'"

Comment Re:One argument I've heard (Score 1) 284

people will feel that software is a commodity rather than a specialized product that requires a lot of hard work and brainpower to properly develop Even considering myself a OS defender, I kinda have to agree with your friend, no some time ago, before european patent directive were rejected I was talking about them with some of my friends about how software like vlc or filezilla _could_ dissapear because of them. Their response was "bah, I don't mind, some other program will eventually appear" ... I felt a little frustated, most people think developing software is think about it, nap your fingers and it's done, be it freely available or commercial or whatever. I guess it's some kind of "educational" fault, education the average Joe lacks.

Slashdot Top Deals

If it has syntax, it isn't user friendly.

Working...