The Hive Mind has no business doing my thinking for me, because it seems the Lowest Common Denominator (or at least the Mean, then) drowns out the outliers, by sheer volume and algorithmic amplification. And the outliers are where progress is at (or doom, so you need to sift them critically, not by popularity or even your own ingrained biases).
Just last night over supper with some relations, one person bemoaned all the cat and off-the-rails preacher videos that get forwarded to her by well-meaning friends. I just smirked and told her "and then you ask me why I don't install Whatsapp".
People whose only accomplishment in life is philosophy may frown at people wanting to unplug from the collective thinking
Vibe coding is nothing new. I am right now looking at some component that the newest, youngest member of our team wrote. They basically took some existing code that did something similar to what was needed, and modified it just enough to "just work". Lots of nonfunctional code: it executes (and eats how many cycles), but has no effect on the result. Some identifiers have not been renamed so as to remain meaningful. Also some crude tack-ons that are pretty hard to understand and don't follow the rest of the pattern. In short, well on its way to be a maintenance nightmare.
Thankfully it is not too big, and I got the task to rewrite it to use a different library, which will require it to be fundamentally restructured in any case (it will be much simpler). Oh, the Pull Request will still show *some* relationship to the previous commit.
But it sort of reminds me of the way LLMs use existing code and mix-and-match it up without really understanding what's up or why something was done the way it was done.
Who says humans even need a life purpose? What if I just want to eat pizza, play Fortnite, and die of coronary disease?
I've gotten a fair amount of short-format videos shoved at me on social media that shall remain unnamed. Driven by a load of psychological bulldustery-driven exhortation. Be a better version of yourself. Be more socially engaging. Speak better. How to dress better, walk better, exercise better, eat better, sleep better. Make more money, rise up the career ladder, "win" at life. First world issues.
Some of it contradicting some other.
Enough, I say. Or rather: already too much. Leave me be. Because humans are not a one size fits all psychology. If I want to be better informed regarding some topic, I'll go search out information on it. I'm fatigued now by The Push. I certainly do not want to be pushed by another slopcial medAI monetization engine.
... disrupting the simple, seamless way their Apple products work together
Well, I like products that also work together simply and seamlessly with products from OTHER brands. (I mean, it's still an ideal in many cases, and unfortunately big brands all would like to have their own walled ghett... I mean, garden.)
Yeah, till they create a black hole and we are all spaghettified.
While another comment mentions The Italian Institute of National Physics (I don't know why them specifically), I believe it is just as plausible that we will be spätzleified, kartoffelpuffer-mit-apfelmusified, or even racletted.
It is named after Lee Child's fictitious ex-military investigator with a penchant to beat bad guys up, because of the camera: nothing escapes its keen observation.
Criminal gangs are notorious for how dumb they are and the mistakes they make.
The ones that got caught. Sampling bias and all that....
Wait, new "stuff" will come with documentation??? That is actually informative??? I thought the way these days is to make a long winded and rambling Udemy course that only touches the most basic and common theoretical use cases.
On a more serious note, LLMs will probably be able to take said material, either written or audiovisual, as training input.
But I guess in the end it will be just machines talking to each other, so they will make up their own "stuff".
Take an astronaut to launch.