Neil's hipocracy? (Score 1)

Anyone struck by the self-serving nature of an artist who, having made a boatload of money in the pre-internet era, now says that he's "not concerned with the effects of piracy on artists" these days? Now he can afford to be holier-then-thou and claim that it's all about the sound quality. Nice, coming from someone with a net worth of $65 million (according to celebritynetworth.com), living on a huge property ("Broken Arrow Ranch") outside of SF? Wonder how those starving artists who can't sell a CD due to piracy feel about Neil.