Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
The Courts

Judge Rules Fox Has Copyright Claim To Watchmen 262

fermion writes "According to the NYT, a judge has decided that Fox owns the copyright to Watchmen, not Warner. Is this an example of copyright law becoming so complex that companies can abuse the court system to prevent competition, or just extreme incompetence by Warner? In the current business environment, either explanation is believable. Yet it is unbelievable that seasoned producers would spend hundreds of millions of dollars to create a movie that they can't even release. It seems the judge didn't want to bring this to a jury, and maybe daring Warner to appeal, or Fox to settle." The article says that Fox acquired movie rights to the Watchmen story in the late 1980s, but budget disputes and personnel changes have muddied the waters; Wikipedia has a bit more on the "development hell" which has plagued the film project.

Comment Discriminate, but be pragmatic (Score 1) 665

My two cents.... I think that using the best available tool when you need them isn't wrong. But I think that we should always discriminate against proprietary software and use it when one really needs it i.e your a professional graphic artist and you need Photoshop or there is no open source equivalent choice available. The important thing is to let know companies that users demand free software and will always prefer free software. For example I may use the NVIDEA proprietary drivers now, but the next time a buy a video card I will go with ATI because they plan to start offering free drivers. This way we can be both "pragmatic" and "idealistic" at the same time.

Slashdot Top Deals

Doubt is a pain too lonely to know that faith is his twin brother. - Kahlil Gibran

Working...