I've been blocking ads ever since they started to impact my browsing experience. I have no problem with ads as long as they are not intrusive, cause my page to move around and remain in the page. But once they started that stupidity, it was game on. Between Brave and NextDNS, I have forgotten what the "normal" browsing experience is like and I'm not going back just yet. I could be interested in micro-transactions as support.

When will it stop being called a SSL cert? There has never been nor will there ever be a SSL cert. A; it's a x.509 certificate and B; no one uses SSL anymore, it's TLS

It's always a Trump issue. Stop and think for a minute. That rule was setup when TV viewing was restricted to a big box in the living room and gated by the geography where you reside. Now, TV is viewed more on mobile devices than the big box and you can turn to streaming too.

I will be switching to this for my next upgrade.

Yeah.... not interested. I watch TV to get away from technology (I/T guy here). I have a phone, tablet and laptops for using AI. I damn sure don't need nor want it in my TV nor do I need a Samsung account (Galaxy S24+ and Tab7+ and I only have a Samsung account out of curiosity; it's never been useful for me). Besides, I can get as good of a Vizio TV for half the price of a Samsung TV.

Obviously you don't possess grade school reading comprehension.

Being wrong once and now trying to conflate with another topic. And yet, wrong again. Learn how to use Google: There is no evidence in the provided context that French authorities or entities attempted to bribe Halliburton or Dick Cheney. The DOJ and SEC investigations found no evidence of personal wrongdoing by Cheney. No charges were ever filed against him in the United States Nest?

No again. The asbestos situation has been going on since the 1920's

I had to dust off my old logon that I hadn't used in years just to respond to this. He was not responsible for it all. He was at Halliburton from 1995-2000. Halliburton bought a company that had a subsidiary that was involved with asbestos. If you're going to s*** post, at least look up the facts first.

I agree. You can offend anyone but that doesn't make it hate speech. Fuck Twitter. We should create our own version of it.

Bush and Obama have both had this "power". You're probably leaving out those details and using Trump's name because you didn't vote for him and you're trying to stir up controversy. Quit being a liberal snow flake!!

This looks like their Layer 8 product: http://www.flashnetworks.com/L... The Layer8 platform helps mobile operators engage with their subscribers as they browse the web, and to offer them information and services that generate new downstream revenues from over-the-top affiliations. Layer8 is a clientless solution which appears over web pages on smartphones, tablets, and laptops. Does anyone know if the javascript was archived somewhere? I'd like to see it.

Ok, so let's give them that one. However, what they didn't define is what KIND of jobs are created for American citizens? Barista's at StarBucks? Burger flippers at McD's? Housekeeping at Marriott? Waiting tables at ______? I DID NOT list those jobs because I think I'm better than people who hold such a job NOR do I think any less of people in such jobs. My point is, I expect that these "created" jobs are no more than minimum (or barely more than minimum) wage paying jobs. They are jobs, not careers like what the H-1B Visa workers have.

I've actually had a purchased VOD title removed from me. I contacted Amazon to investigate and was told the the movie studio decided to pull the license from Amazon and go else where (probably an exclusive). I understand their desire for that type of licensing deal, however I had already purchased it and should still be able to watch my legally purchased license. What they should have done was after a certain date, you can no longer purchase it from Amazon but can still view your purchase. I complained about the "theft" of my video and Amazon was more than happy to refund my money. I don't know if it's a limitation of their system or fine print in the licensing but the government should step in and stop this practice. That is why I've started bookmarking ALL of my VOD purchases just so I can keep track of them and know where it was purchased (Amazon, Vudu/Ultraviolet, Google Play, Target, etc.).

Maybe Google should have licensed the use of Android with an agreement that parties will not sue each other or Google over (questionable?) infringements. I'd guess that they're all sueing because if you add up all their market share together, you'd probably have 10% of the market. Sore losers. Just another reason why I'll never own a Microsoft, Apple, Sony or RIM phone.