Comment the state of widget sets. (Score 1) 142
IMHO
Well that sucks. But I guess it will only push for
a better solution to the linux desk top. I set out one day to determine which widget set makes the most sense, so I wrote the same app in gtk and in QT. QT was a breeze to program in and was intuitive and I had no problem completing my task. But gtk was a mess, It feels like a kludge and is very non-intuitive, I never finished the application, and I refuse to touch gtk again.
Overall
gtk is fast, but is a mess to code in.
qt not so fast, easy to program in, but not GNU
But in my search I found the FOX widget set. It Rocks. It is easy to program in and is fast AND it compiles in Windows and linux with out much work. Things just make sense with FOX. It is easier to use the QT it is GNU it is cross platform, is supports MDI, it ROCKS.
http://cyberia.cfdrc.com/FOX/fox.html
flame me if you want.
celer
Well that sucks. But I guess it will only push for
a better solution to the linux desk top. I set out one day to determine which widget set makes the most sense, so I wrote the same app in gtk and in QT. QT was a breeze to program in and was intuitive and I had no problem completing my task. But gtk was a mess, It feels like a kludge and is very non-intuitive, I never finished the application, and I refuse to touch gtk again.
Overall
gtk is fast, but is a mess to code in.
qt not so fast, easy to program in, but not GNU
But in my search I found the FOX widget set. It Rocks. It is easy to program in and is fast AND it compiles in Windows and linux with out much work. Things just make sense with FOX. It is easier to use the QT it is GNU it is cross platform, is supports MDI, it ROCKS.
http://cyberia.cfdrc.com/FOX/fox.html
flame me if you want.
celer
