
Journal Journal: Ramblings on PC Building
With the new year coming I have decided to work on a new gaming rig. I am currently in the planning stage of fitting it into my budget to where I can hopefully save up a hefty sum of cash to purchase what will be for at least a week "a top of the line gaming rig". But many lingering questions come up:
Which is better Intel or AMD? NVIDIA or ATI?
I already know I am going with the great quality product (horrible quality tech support) of ASUS for my motherboard and graphic card needs, a good ol Audigy 2 ZS, and onboard just about everything (which is incredibly stupid except for NICs and USB).
The deal with the Intel or AMD is coming down to raw processor speed, FSB, and cache. Intel has the better processor speeds and they advertise a 800mHz FSB. But after further investigation, it appears the FSB on the P4s are just 4 piped 200mHz FSB to total just one. The AMD FSB is only 533mHz but its a true 533mHz. The AMDs also run a lot slower in the processor speed than the P4s. The P4s also have twice the cache size as the AMDs. The AMDs also allow 64 bit architecture. Also AMDs are cheaper to their comparative Intels.
The view on the video cards is also a tough decision. A) I like to run Linux, B) I also like to run games in Windows. ATI to me has the better video cards but they are lacking (but improving!) in the Linux driver support category. I really think their improvements make the choice for an ATI x800 XT a no brainer. I just hope they will be in stock in about 3 months or so...