,,, on low-risk choices, which is what the study measured.

Give a mild electric shock to participants when wrong and let's see if the results stay the same.

The plan is to create a semiconductor cluster. It's EU money (NextGenerationEU) earmarked for R&D, digital and green technologies.

Inflation does not paint the whole picture.

Average new house in 1938 was 7.5 years worth of minimum wage. A new house in 2016 is 23-27 years (median, average).
Yearly Harvard tuition was 0.80 years of m.w., today it is 4 years worth.
Average rent went from 0.60 to 0.95 of a m.w. a month.

Cost of living has not increased linearly with inflation. Other than movie tickets (steady around 1 hour of m.w) and a significant decrease of food and clothing costs, mostly everything has gone up at a rate way higher than inflation.

Steam (and other game companies) sells games under half of the US price in Mexico, but it's not related to GDP or out of fairness, it's the bottom line. They know they won't sell many games at $60 (median professional take home is $300 a week), but $25 is attractive enough, and the more people playing a game, the better it sells, so there's extra incentive for them to sell it cheaper.

Microsoft took a similar approach for lustrums, by letting cheaper markets pirate their software freely, then grabbing enterprise and government contracts, without much care about the small business or the home market. Again, not out of fairness.

Autodesk and Siemens have also alternate pricing on emerging markets.

Considering the immense amount of care required for a newborn to reach self sustenance I believe that you are full of shit my friend.

Why wouldn't it be right? If your spouse takes your car and maliciously destroys it. Let's say because you cheated. You would have a legal standing about the destruction of said vehicle as a criminal mischief (This figure already exists on most places).

You cannot file a "querella" against yourself in Mexican law. You couldn't even begin to start the legal process, even if you could it would get dismissed ASAP.

Except it is not.

"Dolo" is carefully explained in the jurisprudence of Mexican law and it's, more often than not, used in an exculpatory way than the opposite.

It implies malicious intent and awareness of the crime that's being committed. Intent is a very hard thing to prove in a tribunal of law.

And I'm not being "very naive", I understand enough of the Mexican judicial system to know how quickly a case would be dismissed if someone tried to use it for such purposes. You just would have to recourse to an "amparo" (another figure of the Mexican judicial system, kind of an emergency remedy for rights protections) citing the previous jurisprudence and suspend the charges until they could prove your intent.

None of the claims in the article are true. While the draft has many inconsistencies and deficiencies (no exceptions for white hat or academic hacking among others), it does not criminalize anything of what is said in the article. Said law has been attacked heavily due to political reasons (Senator is on his way to be a governor candidate) and not because the law itself (that is really needed as there is a void in the legislation on cyber-crime that's due for over a decade).

You have to understand the Mexican judicial system is different and laws are not interpreted in the same way as English common law (Mexico uses civil law with heavier Roman law influences).

The wording of the law where people are claiming it would be illegal to modify your own PC, specifically words "dolosamente", which roughly could be translated to "with malicious intent". So yes, the purpose of said law is to criminalize any modifications or alterations to an information system with malicious intent, not wiping your own mobile. Both the original 3RD and gizmodo articles deliberately choose to omit that part. Which any decent lawyer or tribunal wouldn't.

The law also provides that any of the crimes in it will be prosecuted as private crimes, where the affected part needs to press charges and can withdraw them (issue a private pardon) at any time; with the exception of crimes against public infrastructure. It also provides that tribunals & judges must be consulted by IT experts on any cases regarding the law (so interpretation of the law would be influenced by the industry professionals).

I can only assume this was a clever experiment to make your lab assistants remove their shirts, for science.

After that you just become Galactus.

This has been ongoing for at least a decade in Mexico. From the infamous blogdelnarco to twitter. I don't see how this is news today.

And this is why I always wear a donkey piñata over my head when I ride my bicycle.

Would be better if they throw those 2 millions and change into a legal and appeal the resolution.

Worse thing that can happen is patent trolls getting precedent.

We once got a 2,000 person venue for free. We only had to pay for the extra security personnel, permits, and we even got a % of the beverage sales.

Lights and sound aren't that expensive to rent, and a lot of bands travel light. Hardest part of the logistics was taking care of all the legalese. You need to be smart with the planning and get as much sponsors as possible. You can even get some government money or tax discounts.

Bands make money from merchandise, not just tickets. And most of them just have a flat fee per concert, or charge according to venue size. Big name bands obviously have venue size requirements.

Of course you can have all kind of mental blocks to think it's not possible. I know it's possible, and can't wait for the next one.