http://warfare.ru/?lang=&linkid=2083&catid=312
The P-500 missile is similar in appearance to the P-6/35 and was powered by a liquid-fuel sustainer and solid-rocket booster. It has a speed of Mach 2 at high altitude and Mach 1.5-1.6 at low altitude. The flight profile of the missile varies from 30 to 7,000 m (low-low or low-high). Guidance is based on a digital INS on a gyro- stabilized platform and an active-radar seeker, which periodically switches to passive mode. For the first time, the missile was equipped with a digital computer (Tsifrova Vichislenna Mashina, "digital computing device"). The guidance system was also equipped with a datalink to communicate between missiles in a salvo, with a salvo consisting of eight missiles launched at short intervals. Usually, one of the missiles flies high (5,000-7,000 m) to pick up the target, while the rest remain at medium to low altitude with their radar seekers switched to passive mode. The leading missile then transmits targeting data to the others and allocates individual targets, with half of the salvo directed at the aircraft carrier and half at other ships in the area, one apiece. The onboard radar seekers are turned on at the last moment, just before reaching the target.If the lead missile is shot down, another one (in a programmed sequence) takes over and climbs to a higher altitude to continue directing the salvo. All the missiles have active radar jamming to disrupt any defensive action from fighters and shipboard air-defense systems. In addition, vital parts of the P-500 missile are armored to increase survivability.

smallfurry from SZ?

The headline says, "India First To Build a Supersonic Cruise Missile". In order to even accurately reflect the article, it should read, "India First To Build a manoeuvrable Supersonic Cruise Missile". But even so, the article is wrong;

from wikipedia, P-500 Bazalt

The P-500 Bazalt (Russian: -500 ; English: basalt) is a liquid-fueled, rocket powered, supersonic cruise missile used by the Soviet and Russian navies. Developed by OKB-52 MAP (later NPO Mashinostroyeniye), its GRAU designation is 4K80[1]. Its NATO reporting name is SS-N-12 Sandbox. It entered service in 1973 to replace the SS-N-3 Shaddock. The P-500 Bazalt had a 550 km range and a payload of 1,000 kg, which allows it to carry a 350 kT nuclear or a 950 kg semi-armor-piercing high explosive warhead (currently only the conventional version remains in service). The P-500 Bazalt uses active radar homing for terminal guidance, and can receive mid-course corrections by the Tupolev Tu-95D, the Kamov Ka-25B and the Kamov Ka-27B.

So many levels of fail in this submission

The summary implies that reducing the number of science graduates would provide an incentive for companies to increase the pay of scientists and engineers. I counter that a reduced amount of science graduates would simply increase the number of H1B visas granted which will in turn drive down the pay for native scientists and engineers.

The congressional report lists the premium for internists, not interns.

internist
-noun
a physician specializing in the diagnosis and nonsurgical treatment of diseases, esp. of adults.

Also the the graph you reference shows the rates from Connecticut, the state with the second highest malpractice premiums according to the Medical Liability Monitor.

"medical predators and ambulance chasing lawyers" amount to "less than one-half of a percentage point of medical spending" It's hardly the driving force in the cost of health insurance.

That's true but tort reform has little to do with the cost of health care.

Yes, health care needs to be fixed; however tort reform is the exact opposite of fixing the system. Tort reform is a dream come true for managed care providers. They can deny care or approve cheaper, inappropriate treatments with less consequence. For example Joe has cancer. Joe's insurance can either pay for two million dollar chemotherapy or deny treatment. With say a $50,000 cap on malpractice suits the choice for the managed care provider becomes a clear. The clear choice being the denial of treatment. Protestations based on the altruism of corporations are laughable, managed care providers are currently denying care under the above premise. Making it easier for them to do so is the exact opposite of reform.

Not saying you.. but a common mistake people make with wireless routers is to treat them like modems and tuck them away out of sight.. In the 2Wire modems case, it needs to be standing upright..Those that set it on it's side are broadcasting signals into the surface it's laying on. It also helps some to elevate the router a bit if you can. Yes signals can go through walls and maybe it doesn't make sense, but give it a try and see if you get better results if you get a clearer path. The channel problem probably isn't as bad as you think, and I suspect it is more to do with your router, or the wireless adapter in your laptop.

Faster than a V8 Jaguar XK, (0-60 under 5 seconds), 500+ bhp, 188 mile range (not bad for a sports car), recharge in _10_minutes_ http://www.lightningcarcompany.co.uk/home.php

That would be the problem.

There's a reason virtually all trains use electric motors (even most diesels). Electric motors are really good! They're small, cheap, lightweight, high torque, reliable - better than ICE in most respects. Batteries are a problem. They're big, expensive, and charging takes time.

That sounds like an idea for a really good game...