<quote>

<quote><p>If you can only call, talk and hang up, it doesn't appear very useful to me. Listening would be a nice addition, and receiving calls as well...</p></quote>

<p>It's obviously targeted at women.</p></quote>

Ah, that explains the pricetag.

Synopsis:

while (true) {
    if (stockMarket.isDown()) {
        sueHumansRandomlyToCoverLosses();
    else {
        buyStock();
        laughAtHumanMinions();<br>
        printf("Greed is 01000111011011110110111101100100");
    }
}

Isn't this like putting av vault door on a cardbox? I've never understood why people thinks biometrics on laptops is a good idea: Unless you're using encryption, all your data is available to the first n00b who knows how use mount...

http://slashdot.org/story/10/05/14/1225256/Hacking-Automotive-Systems

Check out the researchers web site here or the full paper here, doesn't seem that hard.

I like the "self destruct" feature btw....

Physical access = pwnage. Unless these Aussies have built the hardware components as tamper proof devices from the bottom and up (which of course, they haven't), i'll bet my physical pants that these laptops will be hacked before the retard in TFA can spell 'unhackable'.

Jesus, don't we have a car analogy to go with this legal issue? All this talk about bridges are downright confusing...