Comment Re:Ridiculous (Score 1) 709
this is the kind of insensitivity i'm talking about! i mean, what about all those parents who don't bother to screen for their kids! are you suggesting that they should be held responsible?
a.) not bother to read what i have said and respond to it anyway or
b.) intentionally misinterpret/selectively ignore parts of what i have written.
i was so good. i went cold turkey. i was so productive at work. now, the instant there's something i don't want to do, it's slashdot.org.
my karma is excellent. this is a bad sign. means i've been spending too much time here.
if only new articles didn't come out so frequently, i'd be able to resist. if only they weren't interesting. craigslist holds no temptation for me. there is only slashdot.
On the other hand, if GFS doesn't do something intelligent about security, then we're left with the same fundamental problem that NFS has. Namely, we need to presume that it operates within a local environment in which all users on the inside are trusted. (Insert end-to-end argument here.)
Obviously the idea of "secure network" is a myth, and when I first glanced at the headline on Slashdot, I was hoping that GFS would be a step in the right direction toward a secure filesystem that actually stands a chance of being implemented in servers like the ones produced by NetApp. I guess I am disappointed.
you are always here for me when i need you. when work gets to be too much. when i just can't think anymore. when i absolutely need to know right now what the most recent technological development in the northern part of spain is. but it's too much. i think we need some space.
i appreciate you, and you're an important part of my life, but there are other things in my life too. like work. i never get any work done anymore. that's the main thing really.
This process can check if this value is zero, and if it is, it does something child-like. -- Forbes Burkowski, CS 454, University of Washington