Don't they have to stop blowing up first?

Does he want to wait until the astronauts are off the station?

It was published in March 2022: https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.10...

From the article, "He’s told his followers that “cash is trash” and that he doesn’t trust the U.S. dollar, calling it “fake.” Instead, he’s recommended investing in assets like precious metals, bitcoin or Wagyu cattle."

I thought this was great advice, so I tried to pay for my Starbucks' caramel apple spice espresso macchiato with a Wagyu steer. It was a bit awkward getting that bull over the counter, but otherwise, no problem. They tried to give me change in gold bullion, but I saw that the spot market of gold prices was dropping that morning, so I asked for Dogecoin instead. Et voila! 90 minutes later I was sipping my (by then) cold coffee. Easy peasy.

AGI will be here in ten years and it will be used to design a working power plant employing nuclear fusion.

My gut says intuition plays a big role.

I do not think this is a good idea. It is, in fact, a bad idea. It is an idea that should not be pursued or implemented or enacted. I am not in favor of this idea. I am in favor of other things -- like kittens, which are small, immature domestic cats.

Keep Battelle away from the bidding process unless you want Fermilab to turn into the Dunder Mifflin of science labs.

Reading about how it works, I sure hope none of the astronauts suffer from enuresis.

Neigh, say it isn't so!

.. calls about parasitic worm infestations in humans are way, way down.

"Worldcoin has designed an orb-shaped device that would scan a person's iris to construct a unique personal identifier."

In related news, I will be marketing grapefruit spoons to cybercriminals.

Deutsche Bank could make a big dent in this by collecting the $300M they loaned Trump and redistributing it. Call it a tax on grossly unethical behavior.

You need to know more than the false positive rate alone. Rolling a D20 would give you a false positive rate of 5% too.

Simple: funding. It's similar to how negative results get such a poor reception. Journals, funding agencies, tenure committees, don't want to hear "we didn't discover what we were hoping to find" and they're only slightly more receptive to "we discovered exactly what we expected". They like to hear "man! you'll be as surprised as we were when you hear what we found."