Comment Re:Yet another cloud? (Score 1) 366
Intel seems to be intentionally muddying the terminology to defend their business model. "Here's a cloud on your desk" says you can have parallelism while owning (and buying) your own CPU.
As an aside, Intel is right and Google is wrong, IMHO. Most of the money in a CPU is in the development, not in the hardware. And chip manufacturing benefits greatly from scale. If Google makes it so that people don't buy their own CPUs, it will only save money in the short run. The more people rely on Google's Clouds, the more Google will have to pay for each CPU. Meanwhile Intel can sell cheap versions of what Google needs to the consumer. Cut out networking overhead, get a workstation . . . I mean a Cloud on your desk!
We've seen this pendulum swing before, and it always comes back. Those who want computing have to pay for the development of computers somehow. In a world in which the incremental cost is low to own your personal copy of Intel's (or AMD's or whoever's) Intellectual Property in silicon, the workstation will always win out.
Until silicon is replaced with something much more expensive.