I used to think that too, my boss would ask me to re-schedule holidays, be contactable etc. and of course I would regularly get at least one phone call when I was away on holidays. Then one day, I told them that I was going away for 2 weeks and that I would be on a ship in the middle of the North Sea with no access to email or phone or any communication medium of any sort (well, the ship could be contacted by radio for life threatening emergencies but that was only given to my next of kin). Guess what? They gave me the time (a couple of hours) to properly hand over to some of my colleagues so that they would ensure that there would be no need to contact me for two weeks. Issues did arise while I was away but because the hand-over had been done as it should have been, all of them were dealt with properly, the ones that really needed my attention were dealt with adequately in such a way that it could wait for my return.
The best thing out of that experience is that the colleagues who filled in for me learnt stuff in the process and proved that they could handle more responsibilities. The consequence was that management became a lot more relaxed about people taking leave and also used it as a way to get people to work on areas they had little knowledge about and increase their skills and overall knowledge of the business in the process.
Generally speaking, if people have an easy cop out that consists in calling you when they don't know an answer, they will do it. If they find themselves in a situation where they can't call you, they will usually work out the answer themselves. It is less efficient short term but more efficient long term because it helps share the knowledge and skills. If the gap in knowledge between you and your colleagues is so great that you can't be away for a couple of weeks without drastic consequences, then your management should do everything they can to narrow that gap because it means that losing you (because you resign, have an accident or any other reason) is a massive risk.
Not questioning you here but just wondering, where do you get the time to read an average of 3 books a week? Are you employed? Do you shop, cook, exercise? How long does it take you to read a book with 200 to 300 pages?
Easy to do for those of us who take public transport to work: 1 hour on the tube (underground) on the way to work + 1 hour on the way back + 1 hour to unwind at night before going to bed. Of course the time on the tube is not as efficient reading as the time at home due to it being crowded but it still adds up very easily.
You can look at geothermal all you want but when it comes to France, you may find a distinct lack of volcanic activity: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_volcanoes_in_France. So although you could use geothermal heat pumps, that's not practical to do on a large scale.
At the end of the day, a sensible energy policy has to be based on local conditions. For France, you're probably better off using a combination of wind (near the coast) and solar (in the South) with possibly a small geothermal capacity in the Massif Central (which wouldn't necessarily help as it's one of the least populated part of the country).
Indeed! For the record, Vala was actually inspired by C# so any Java / C# / C++ developer should need very little time to pick it up.
Oh and if you have any issues when importing your F-Spot database to Shotwell, please file a ticket so that I can fix it.
Then when it completely works on those, test on IE and for the parts that don't work on IE, use one of the many well known hacks that will provide IE with different values. The best hacks make use of tag selectors that either only IE understands (because IE has embraced and extended the specs) or only IE doesn't understand (because IE doesn't implement the specs fully). Then you can isolate IE specific code.
Doing it this way, you promote the use of standard compliant browsers because you design primarily for them and it will work in all of them. but at the same time, you cater for the vast majority of IE users.
For more information on suck hacks, go and see sites like A List Apart.
You might argue that it is a pain to have to add IE specific hacks but don't forget that HTML/CSS is not meant to provide exact layout. So if something looks slightly different in different browsers but is usable, don't bother with a hack, just leave it as is. If your layout is flexible enough, this should be what happens most of the time.
Getting the job done is no excuse for not following the rules. Corollary: Following the rules will not get the job done.