Comment right to be forgotten (Score 2, Insightful) 182
It doesn't remove any of the source information - it just makes it harder to find - and makes the net less useful.
Here are just two of many recent examples:
anecdotes != data
There is not enough money to properly secure enough voting machines for everyone to vote.
Seriously. Why are we throwing money at this. Paper ballots are auditable and have been good enough for hundreds of years. Quit trying to fix EVERYTHING with technology.
I've always though the solution was *incredibly simple.
Have an electronic voting machine that *also prints out a paper copy of the voter's selections.
The voter verifies the paper ballot and drops in a slot at the machine to register the vote.
So you now have complete paper ballots and complete electronic ballots.
Randomly check some number of precincts in every election to verify the counts match.
If there's a discrepancy then count the paper from all the precincts and use that total.
So now you've gained ~85% of the benefit offered by electronic voting (speed, accuracy, etc. etc) and lost none of the accountability.
This seems incredibly simple and workable.
Which is probably why it will never happen.
Is it possible that software is not like anything else, that it is meant to be discarded: that the whole point is to always see it as a soap bubble?