Comment Better Unix on Windows? (Score 1) 545
Our scientific application runs on Windows, Mac, and Unix. We recently started the port to Windows, and I have to say that Microsoft Services for Unix proved to be completely useless -- it has virtually zero compatibility with Linux, and even after installing a whole whack of third party downloads to get all the normal tools installed (ex. GNU make, etc.), I still couldn't use it because of missing things. Like, it didn't even have the BASH shell, and even when I manually installed that, it wasn't configured properly. I don't have time for this kind of nonsense. We eventually abandoned it, and are using CYGWIN. You know, this is frankly pathetic.
Microsoft should take a clue from how Amazon sponsers thousands of other booksellers -- if Microsoft embraced Unix/Linux, instead of merely tolerating it and claiming to offer interoperability while really not doing so, then it would probably be much further ahead.
Whatever happened to "embrace and extend"????
Microsoft should take a clue from how Amazon sponsers thousands of other booksellers -- if Microsoft embraced Unix/Linux, instead of merely tolerating it and claiming to offer interoperability while really not doing so, then it would probably be much further ahead.
Whatever happened to "embrace and extend"????