'terrorists' I imagine means Isis ( by definition, the us would be one too but never mind that). However, is is is lacking refinweiea. They do sell unrefined oil to others such as turkey a close ally of the us In it's fight against Isis. Hold in, something's not right here.. maybe they actually like the destabilising effect of Isis? Would you look at that!!

Currently, the aggressor is the USA trying to create conflict in Europe like what a self respecting empire would do. It already succeeded to destabilise the middle East more than it was already bringing irak to its knees, bleed out iran, destroy Syria, support a military coup in Egypt, destabilise Algeria and so on. There was an agreement to not expand NATO (which is a us initiative) eastwards for Russia's agreement to allow reunification of Germany besides other agreements and NATO is currently no more than 1000 km from Moscow. Meaning nuclear missiles as close as 1000 km. It's like Russia having nuclear missiles in cuba. Further, Russia has a proven track record of sticking to its commitment in oil and gas delivery as long as payment is done. So there is not much I would worry about other than it being a general dependency. If you want to worry about anything then please about us nuclear missiles stationed in Europe!