Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
Compare cell phone plans using Wirefly's innovative plan comparison tool ×

Comment Re:Should Be... (Score 2) 499

So you think marijuana should be illegal for the same reasons I assume? Whatever the state deems in a persons best interest should be law, right? What about when the state is wrong? Like perhaps when they told us to change our diets to try and avoid heart disease and made the problem worse? Randomness in society performs an important function. Without it we can create some genetic messes that are beyond our current understanding. For that reason, people should be left to live their lives however they want. Let the passage of time decide if it matters, not men who usually get things wrong. I get that the risk of adverse vaccine reactions is far lower then what the risk would have been for the condition being vaccinated. That doesn't change a person who does the risk/reward and sees no upside to a rare condition in their area with a known risk factor. It doesn't make them stupid, they evaluated the risk/reward environment and came up with a different answer then you did. If that answer burns them, so be it. You can't use force and ridicule to make people do everything you want and win every argument. Due to that mindset, we are going to get President Trump. Good job guys...

Comment Re:Should Be... (Score 0) 499

The thing with people who make arguments like this is they rarely have children and usually state a desire to never have children. But they sure are concerned about what our children are doing. Being a parent is incredibly complex compared to what I expected. Even as a biomedical scientist, I can't bring myself to get on the case of parents who choose different paths. For those that think its such a big deal, they should have kids and get them vaccinated or whatever thing they will be bitching about what parents do next week.

Comment Re:Willing to pay up in cases of death/injury? oth (Score 1) 103

Assuming that the auto-drive was on and there was no tampering of the system then, it should be payed out the same way as no-fault insurance (a model we should have moved to decades ago).

Just wanted to point out how no fault works as it is commonly misunderstood. No fault coverage, more commonly called something like personal injury protection (PIP), is a bucket of insurance that covers the policy holder and members of their household. This coverage is usually a small amount of money like $20k. It pays for the first $20k in medical bills and work loss resulting from an accident for the policy holder. In no way does no fault or PIP absolve a party to an accident from liability. If a person is injured in an accident, their PIP/no fault coverage pays their first 20k in medical bills and if the other driver has some level of fault, their liability coverage pays the remaining claims. Its also important to understand that everyone has some level of fault in an accident, even the guy who was hit in a parked car. If you live in a no fault state review your policy and correct your worldview on the most misunderstood insurance concept that has ever been devised.

Comment Re:Fiduciary responsibility? (Score 1) 387

Facebook has a duty to protect its core business. People are more likely to abandon Facebook if they try and push a political slant. People are not stupid and see through crap like that. The general discourse on Facebook is already so low that I closed up shop there months ago and have no plans to return. It has become a cesspool. If Facebook wants to become the next Myspace, they should be sure to give those on the edge of quitting a little push.

Comment Re:Still voting for Bernie (Score 1) 212

You state "Still voting for Bernie" as your subject and then go on to write an essay that has nothing to do with that argument (see non sequitur.) Nothing about my response is about the credibility of Bernie or Trump. It is about the credibility of their supporters who regularly employ fallacies in the promotion of their preferred candidate. You then reply with an ad hominem when a comment comes pointing out that blind faith is troubling regardless of who is doing it. Support whoever you want, but please, use logic and reason instead of fallacy and emotion. If your guy takes a position that you would burn someone at the stake for, hold them to the same standard. The powers that are trying to "regulate" encryption will not be stopped without holding politicians feet to the fire. No one, Bern, Trump, etc gets a free pass on an abhorrent and technically disastrous policy. When you give a pass on a topic, you tell them that it is not important and this is one of the most important issues.

Comment Re:Moral Panic (Score 1) 115

No one has a right to privacy in an area a drone could see. If you have a privacy concern close your blinds or go inside. If you want to worry about privacy at least pick something that actually invades it like license plate scanners vs a drone that you are convinced is spying on you.

Slashdot Top Deals

To do nothing is to be nothing.

Working...