Comment wait for the other shoe to drop... (Score 1) 500
If history is any guide, the next move will be for Microsoft to offer an attractive discount.
If history is any guide, the next move will be for Microsoft to offer an attractive discount.
Yup.
I'm not able to find Dr. Palem's original paper from the "computer science meeting in San Francisco," but if, as I surmise, he's advocating a new probabilistically-based microprocessor, the question needs to be asked: If we're willing to consider new architectures (and new ways to program them), is a probabilistic one the best solution to the power consumption and performance problems?
One alternative that should be compared to Palem's would be to do the same thing he's advocating -- reduce the precision -- in a more traditional way: explicity reduce the size of the data path. Quite a few applications could get by with shorter-than-32-bit integers. If not 16, maybe 24? For floating point calculations, many GPUs already support a 16-bit "half" or "s10e5" format (IEEE 754 2008) that's just fine for multimedia. There's also a 24-bit format.
Refreshed by a brief blackout, I got to my feet and went next door. -- Martin Amis, _Money_